Java Memory Model mailing list archive
By Author

Starting: Thu Jun 24 1999 - 11:18:00 EDT
Ending: Wed Aug 24 2005 - 14:49:54 EDT

• 914
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 08:21:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 09:03:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: re: synchronized new (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:51:24 EDT)
• Abhik Roychoudhury
  • JavaMemoryModel: A paper on JMM (Tue Jun 04 2002 - 03:13:32 EDT)
• Adalberto Castelo
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: recap: concurrent reads (Mon Dec 13 1999 - 14:04:02 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated thanwe thought (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:15:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 18:28:27 EST)
• Adam Welc
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 22:42:12 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 17:16:08 EST)
• Alex Gontmacher
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions (Sun Jul 04 1999 - 04:58:43 EDT)
• Alex Gontmakher
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Questions about the proposed semantics (Wed May 09 2001 - 23:22:24 EDT)
  • [Fwd: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Questions about the proposed semantics] (Wed May 09 2001 - 23:21:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Questions about the proposed semantics (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 16:32:14 EDT)
• Alexander Terekhov
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sat May 15 2004 - 17:08:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 13:23:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Thu Aug 07 2003 - 10:20:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 11:54:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 06:27:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 17:23:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 15:41:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Memory Model updates in the CLR (Sat May 24 2003 - 15:21:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 03:51:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 15:40:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Cookbook: barriers (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:33:19 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Cookbook: barriers (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 05:43:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 12:02:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 11:37:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 09:16:43 EST)
• Allan Kielstra
  • JavaMemoryModel: Clarification: Acquire/Release Semantics On Volatile Read/Write Is New? (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 19:05:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 18:18:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 15:12:18 EDT)
• Allen Holub
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: javaworld on double-check (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:39:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 14:35:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 21:49:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What do I do with volatiles? (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 22:23:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 17:30:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Fri May 26 2000 - 00:07:32 EDT)
• Andreas Sterbenz
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 14:33:09 EDT)
• Assaf Schuster
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How bad are incorrectly synchronized programs? (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 07:29:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: to hb or not to hb (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 07:27:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 05:09:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: new papers - FYI (Thu Aug 22 2002 - 06:40:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: a naive proposal (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 17:26:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A performance argument against acquire/release ordering, a call for a quantitative approach, and a naive proposal (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 19:13:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Do getfield/putfield correspond to use/assign or load/store? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:07:48 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: revised version of non-operational JMM paper (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 15:42:59 EDT)
• Bart Jacobs
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 22:44:49 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 20:05:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 14:51:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Tue May 03 2005 - 15:03:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reference on "Correctly synchronized programs are sequentially consistent" (Fri Aug 13 2004 - 12:34:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Shall we just punt on which classloaders are reachable? (Thu May 20 2004 - 12:25:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sat May 15 2004 - 19:24:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 12:49:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 05:24:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: "synchronizes with" (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 12:26:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: "synchronizes with" (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 10:17:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 09:27:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 12:58:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:45:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 13:22:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Will String be secure? (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 09:34:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proof to show that M/P obeys SC- (Fri Jan 23 2004 - 07:11:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: An incorrectly synchronized case (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 06:39:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Prescient reads unnecessary? (Wed Nov 12 2003 - 11:55:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Mechanization of core memory model (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 13:30:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 18:07:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 03:59:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Disallowing badly synchronized programs (Sat Feb 15 2003 - 12:31:01 EST)
• Ben Wint
  • JavaMemoryModel: That gap again (Thu Aug 07 2003 - 04:41:14 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: causal warps (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:14:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question: Why is it that Memory Models are Intuitively Hard? (Wed Feb 19 2003 - 14:52:25 EST)
• Bill Pugh
  • JavaMemoryModel: Please move JMM discussion to javamemorymodel-discussion@mimsy.cs.umd.edu (Wed Aug 24 2005 - 11:58:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM not moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Wed Aug 24 2005 - 10:10:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 13:52:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 11:07:04 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 07:25:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Thu Aug 18 2005 - 06:41:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 21:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 19:37:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 proceeding to public final draft without JLS chapter (Thu Aug 05 2004 - 16:54:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Clarification of final field safe contexts (Thu Aug 05 2004 - 13:54:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Slight simplification of semantics on System.in, System.out, System.err (Tue Aug 03 2004 - 14:50:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 going twice... (Thu Jul 22 2004 - 16:37:01 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Changed my mind on final fields (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 16:11:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update on final fields in JVMS (Wed Jul 21 2004 - 08:32:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Coming down to the end on JSR-133 (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 20:27:14 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Tweak to rules on writes to final fields in classfiles (Mon Jul 19 2004 - 11:31:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JSR133-related division of labor between javac and JVM (Thu Jul 15 2004 - 09:54:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 status and plans (Tue Jul 06 2004 - 14:12:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Happy birthday JMM mailing list (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 12:37:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update to Java Memory Model spec (Fri Jun 04 2004 - 22:00:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of (Mon May 31 2004 - 12:37:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Mon May 31 2004 - 12:22:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Forwarded email from Ras Bodik on speculative writes (Fri May 28 2004 - 15:00:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Fri May 28 2004 - 13:44:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Fri May 28 2004 - 13:34:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Fwd: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Fri May 28 2004 - 13:26:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Fri May 28 2004 - 10:51:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Small tweak to causality rules (Thu May 27 2004 - 17:59:59 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Thu May 27 2004 - 17:17:51 EDT)
  • Re: A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Thu May 27 2004 - 16:21:49 EDT)
  • Re: A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Wed May 26 2004 - 13:37:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Small tweak to causality rules (Tue May 25 2004 - 17:07:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Tue May 25 2004 - 14:40:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Mon May 24 2004 - 19:42:09 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are this$x fields final? (Mon May 24 2004 - 17:26:01 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM Final draft Freeze Complete today! (Mon May 24 2004 - 08:52:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: References (Fri May 21 2004 - 13:24:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Shall we just punt on which classloaders are reachable? (Thu May 20 2004 - 10:44:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: References (Thu May 20 2004 - 08:11:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Wed May 19 2004 - 15:11:50 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: References (Wed May 19 2004 - 11:51:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Tue May 18 2004 - 21:34:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Tue May 18 2004 - 15:35:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Previous discussions of final fields: final fields can only be set once in constructors (Mon May 17 2004 - 14:57:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 14:39:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 13:35:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 11:44:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 11:14:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 10:46:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 10:43:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 08:57:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 08:54:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 08:52:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 14:02:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sat May 15 2004 - 15:15:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New description/presentation of semantics of final fields (Fri May 14 2004 - 08:47:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Final fields and deserialization (Tue May 11 2004 - 11:20:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 14:13:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized gettes (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 22:52:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deliberate undersynchronization (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 14:42:01 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Confirmation that we are using strong volatile semantics (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 11:03:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 13:35:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 22:40:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 15:02:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 14:43:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:49:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:08:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 14:40:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another important finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 22:29:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another important finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:56:31 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 15:06:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 13:08:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Do any JVM's move memory accesses across native calls? (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 17:17:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 15:18:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 13:04:43 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:01:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Empty synchronized blocks are not useless (?) (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 14:53:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:56:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 09:54:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:40:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 14:55:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interactions with the environment and non-determinism (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 11:40:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 23:05:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 proposed final draft (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 18:22:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 16:59:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 15:17:26 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Interactions with the environment and non-determinism (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 14:42:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 11:00:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: There is _NO_ interaction between the memory model and synchronous exceptions (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 11:01:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 16:04:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread.stop() (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 09:21:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 09:16:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 08:30:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 08:41:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 11:03:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Sun Apr 04 2004 - 23:18:10 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Choice of formalism for the JSR-133 memory model (Fri Apr 02 2004 - 16:53:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Javadoc terminology for synchronization (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 09:55:21 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: What Causality test cases does the CLI/C# memory model allow? (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 14:04:07 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 17:36:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 15:25:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 10:42:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 09:48:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 11:28:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: "synchronizes with" (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 10:56:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Definition of volatile revisited (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:34:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are correctly synchronized code fragment executions SC? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:08:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Test Case 18 variations (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:01:13 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 13:29:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 12:28:42 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 09:58:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 08:08:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: allowed semantics question (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 23:34:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 21:28:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: another question on volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 21:24:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 20:24:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 17:07:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 17:03:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Motivation/intuition for new model (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:03:07 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:48:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:44:30 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (typo fix) (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:42:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 14:50:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: IMPORTANT: New Unified JMM formalism, $100 reward for any flaws (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 12:22:54 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 11:04:01 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Important typo fix in unified model description: U6 is not allowed (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:17:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: IMPORTANT: New Unified JMM formalism, $100 reward for any flaws (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:01:24 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Important typo fix in unified model description: U6 is not allowed (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 19:56:50 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: IMPORTANT: New Unified JMM formalism, $100 reward for any flaws (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 10:39:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Bugs in Tiger beta 1 (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 17:52:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 14:38:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: (Proposal) Semantics must satisfy Linking Monotonicity. (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 16:33:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 14:11:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Typo in Case 9 and Case 9a? (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 11:04:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 11:05:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:26:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 14:49:49 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Dead email addresses (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 15:54:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 14:55:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 18:26:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thanks for the notes of concern, but I don't have a virus (Tue Feb 17 2004 - 15:45:20 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Updates to M/P model (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 11:22:58 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 is in public review (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 11:21:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Thu Feb 05 2004 - 13:00:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft version of JSR-133 public review document (Mon Feb 02 2004 - 14:10:05 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sat Jan 31 2004 - 16:25:58 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft version of JSR-133 public review document (Thu Jan 29 2004 - 17:00:57 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Wed Jan 21 2004 - 14:52:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Wait/notify semantics [revision] (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 15:38:55 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Wait/notify semantics (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 15:21:49 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 14:10:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I want to prohibit test cases 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 00:10:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Why I want to prohibit test cases 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 00:03:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Sat Jan 17 2004 - 23:39:46 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Sat Jan 17 2004 - 23:35:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Sat Jan 17 2004 - 23:23:30 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 10:16:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 11:40:11 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 07:57:27 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 08:55:06 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: 30 day review period for JSR-133 (Wed Dec 03 2003 - 11:44:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 15:49:29 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 15:42:56 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 22:27:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 16:40:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Let them write race-free code (was: The property of "race-free implies SC") (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:25:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:16:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 11:46:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 12:57:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 09:57:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Wed Oct 29 2003 - 16:47:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Wed Oct 29 2003 - 18:41:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Store/load barrier (Tue Oct 21 2003 - 00:39:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 16:12:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Update to memory model (Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Update to memory model (Sat Aug 30 2003 - 10:38:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update to memory model (Fri Aug 29 2003 - 17:13:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Wed Aug 13 2003 - 16:07:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Community Review Draft updated (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 16:48:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mechanization of core memory model (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 16:06:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 15:14:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 15:00:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 12:09:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JSR-133 Community Review document; submit to JCP tomorrow (Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:57:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:52:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proof that reordering transformation are legal (Mon Aug 04 2003 - 14:54:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposal for how to move forward on test cases 5 and 10 (Mon Aug 04 2003 - 13:55:43 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics vs. compiler optimizations (Sun Aug 03 2003 - 13:27:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: required reads and writes (was: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10) (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 21:15:18 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: When are self-justifying speculative operations allowed? (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 20:21:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: test case 11; allowed by Manson/Pugh but not by SC-1 (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 11:48:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Hoist by my own petard; the real difference between 5 & 6 (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 10:37:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Language semantics cannot depend upon optimization flags (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 21:07:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Bug fixed in test case 6; A and B should initially be 0 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 21:02:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: causal warps (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 18:11:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:46:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Possible weakening of Manson/Pugh model (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:17:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Behavior in test case 7 not allowed by SC-3 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:10:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Results of discussions with Sarita (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:06:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Sarita's SC-2 allows the behavior in causality test 5 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:08:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 13:13:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New one page version of Manson/Pugh core model (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 12:00:04 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 status, schedule and process (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 00:17:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New one page version of Manson/Pugh core model (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 23:03:23 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 15:04:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A major problem with CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 19:57:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final fields, again (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 15:53:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 13:49:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: General rules (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 14:10:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 09:01:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:41:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:43:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: General rules (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:18:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:10:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 17:38:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 14:06:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:21:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 09:59:31 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 02:18:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 01:43:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 01:38:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:41:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:33:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:26:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 14:16:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 13:20:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Data races should not be the buffer overflow of the 21st century (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:30:47 EDT)
  • Data races should not be the buffer overflow of the 21st century (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:30:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 11:24:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 01:54:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 01:26:36 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: high-level summary of our approach and differences from Sarita (Sat Jul 26 2003 - 10:10:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: tiny detail: intra-thread semantics or unithread semantics (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 17:36:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 17:12:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Ok, last thing Monday, rather than first thing (Mon Jul 21 2003 - 21:48:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: jsr-133 status report (Fri Jul 18 2003 - 20:23:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Status report (Thu Jul 17 2003 - 10:00:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: [Figure fix]: Should we prohibit all causal loops? (Fri Jun 27 2003 - 14:28:13 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Should we prohibit all causal loops? (Fri Jun 27 2003 - 10:27:26 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: If your posts don't show up (Sat Jun 07 2003 - 06:36:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Ready for community draft of JSR133? (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 17:30:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon May 26 2003 - 11:03:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 10:43:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 15:02:16 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:39:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 11:11:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 23:01:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 17:41:33 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 13:13:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Josh's finalizer guardian?? (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 11:00:12 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: finalization (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 16:57:10 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:57:32 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Tue Mar 18 2003 - 16:06:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Mon Jan 13 2003 - 16:28:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Mon Dec 02 2002 - 13:13:56 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Our latest trial balloon (Thu Aug 22 2002 - 21:57:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Comments on Sarita's example for our model, and on Sarita's model (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 16:28:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Our latest trial balloon (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 16:29:37 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Comments on Sarita's example for our model, and on Sarita's model (Wed Aug 14 2002 - 15:49:56 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 20:14:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:29:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 16:11:16 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Total ordering of volatile memory operations (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:56:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: SC for DRF programs with Bill/Jeremy's new approach? (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:19:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Update on our alternative JMM specification (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:28:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 11:40:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 12:07:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Design Pattern: Singleton in C#" is dangerously flawed (Mon Jul 29 2002 - 14:54:01 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Double checked locking in C# (Mon Jul 29 2002 - 13:25:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Fri Jul 26 2002 - 14:02:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 15:53:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 15:18:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 14:03:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 13:16:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 12:02:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Fri Jul 19 2002 - 20:16:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing formalization of "causal loop" safety (Tue Jul 16 2002 - 21:01:09 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing formalization of "causal loop" safety (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 10:49:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Sun Jul 14 2002 - 20:56:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: deleting dead volatile ref's (Sun Jul 14 2002 - 21:07:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Wed Jul 10 2002 - 15:17:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Fri Jul 05 2002 - 17:18:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 12:57:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR 133 Status report (Mon Jul 01 2002 - 11:47:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Thu May 30 2002 - 16:18:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Wed May 01 2002 - 10:28:08 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Wed May 01 2002 - 00:19:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Tue Apr 30 2002 - 23:09:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: StringBuffer intensive codes/applications/benchmarks (Thu Apr 25 2002 - 09:20:14 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Tue Apr 23 2002 - 05:57:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 19:31:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 19:22:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 12:29:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Fri Apr 19 2002 - 08:05:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 18 2002 - 09:15:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Java memory model paper at ICSE 2002 (Wed Apr 17 2002 - 13:19:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 04 2002 - 13:21:08 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 04 2002 - 12:07:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Current compliance with volatile? (Thu Mar 28 2002 - 18:00:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Current compliance with volatile? (Wed Mar 27 2002 - 12:51:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Thu Mar 14 2002 - 10:35:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Current stage of proposed Java memory model? (Thu Mar 14 2002 - 10:40:22 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 20:05:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 20:00:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Fri Mar 08 2002 - 11:58:06 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Thu Mar 07 2002 - 15:58:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Thu Feb 07 2002 - 17:02:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Sat Feb 02 2002 - 07:11:24 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Fri Feb 01 2002 - 12:35:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:20:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 19:17:49 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Should we allow synchronized constructors? (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 23:57:48 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Should we allow synchronized constructors? (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 23:17:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 11:40:42 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:37:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:39:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:06:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:08:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 11:39:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 12:18:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 10:20:15 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: repeated email bounces may unsubscribe you from the list (Sat Dec 22 2001 - 07:33:14 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: ECMA CLI/C# spec (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 14:32:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: ECMA CLI/C# spec (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 14:08:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: ECMA CLI/C# spec (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 11:50:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Oops... Forgot non-atomic volatile writes (Wed Dec 19 2001 - 13:27:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Thu Dec 13 2001 - 11:20:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 13:29:07 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Memory Model is _done_ (Tue Nov 27 2001 - 11:40:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Tue Oct 23 2001 - 08:38:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 21:26:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 17:58:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Lunch/dinner get together at OOPSLA? (Sun Oct 14 2001 - 16:06:13 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Lunch/dinner get together at OOPSLA? (Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:32:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: How relaxed should our memory model be? (Fri Oct 05 2001 - 14:00:52 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:52:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings [From Ramki] (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 13:27:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 08:05:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 07:11:52 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 21:23:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 11:51:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 11:36:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 11:36:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 12:31:01 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: We need your litmus tests (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 11:43:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 11:22:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Thu Sep 13 2001 - 23:05:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Thu Sep 13 2001 - 10:23:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Wed Sep 12 2001 - 18:12:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of locks and volatiles (Mon Sep 10 2001 - 11:57:24 EDT)
  • Re: BOUNCE javamemorymodel@cs.umd.edu: Non-member submission from [karthikeyan pck <kars_77@yahoo.com>] (Mon Sep 03 2001 - 10:43:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Do we need to allow this behavior? (Wed Aug 29 2001 - 19:32:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: subtle details for final fields (Wed Aug 29 2001 - 15:29:18 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: subtle details for final fields (Wed Aug 29 2001 - 13:21:18 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Email from Josh on extending thread functionality (Thu Aug 23 2001 - 12:41:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More from Cliff on exceptions (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:48:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New function needed in java.lang.Thread? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:05:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:05:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dependences: [Fwd from Cliff] (Mon Aug 13 2001 - 11:46:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dependences: a concrete example (Mon Aug 13 2001 - 09:28:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Dependences: a concrete example (Sun Aug 12 2001 - 12:39:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Sat Aug 11 2001 - 08:29:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Fri Aug 10 2001 - 11:32:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutableobjects (Thu Aug 09 2001 - 15:43:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Thu Aug 09 2001 - 14:23:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Thu Aug 09 2001 - 14:14:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Thu Aug 09 2001 - 13:47:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Fri Aug 03 2001 - 14:42:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:05:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Wed Jul 18 2001 - 17:47:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barrie rs (Fri Jul 13 2001 - 11:09:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barriers (Fri Jul 13 2001 - 10:56:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: a naive proposal (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 17:13:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: a naive proposal (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 14:32:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: a naive proposal (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 12:21:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 12:03:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 20:19:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply more reliable software (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 14:31:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Importance of volatile performance (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 14:10:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 12:13:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 12:06:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Sat Jul 07 2001 - 21:33:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Sat Jul 07 2001 - 19:10:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel volatile ordering and the optimistic readers trans (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 17:06:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel volatile ordering and the optimistic readers trans (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 15:25:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Mon Jul 02 2001 - 09:28:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Thu Jun 28 2001 - 09:36:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Wed Jun 27 2001 - 22:01:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of locks and volatiles (Wed Jun 27 2001 - 21:59:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Here we go... (Wed Jun 27 2001 - 21:53:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Thu Jun 14 2001 - 10:37:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: [Fwd: double check article: what if constructor throws exception] (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 20:20:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 19:01:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:24:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 21:44:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final fields (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 20:41:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR133 - Java Memory Model (Tue May 29 2001 - 16:26:03 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update on JMM JSR (Thu May 17 2001 - 16:37:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final and fixing the immutable String problem (Tue May 15 2001 - 21:54:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Questions about the proposed semantics (Wed May 09 2001 - 16:05:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Pulling the lever on the JMM JSR (Thu May 03 2001 - 15:29:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Memory Model JSR status report (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:42:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: non-finals with synchronized getters (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 00:06:46 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write ? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 13:51:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Do getfield/putfield correspond to use/assign or load/store? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:26:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Native methods and Final fields (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 15:24:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: javaworld on double-check (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 21:33:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: javaworld on double-check (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 13:18:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 10:55:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 16:25:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 13:59:42 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 21:18:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn't? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 11:21:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: singleton q-of-week (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 20:43:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What do I do with volatiles? (Sat Nov 18 2000 - 07:59:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Required safety guarantees in Java memory model (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 08:33:05 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Required safety guarantees in Java memory model (Thu Nov 16 2000 - 20:20:00 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization optimizations prohibited under CRF (Mon Nov 13 2000 - 11:13:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: more double-checked fun [Fwd from Josh] (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 13:34:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:13:26 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA workshop (Tue Oct 24 2000 - 18:49:06 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The "Double Checked" Declaration is #1 (Fri Oct 13 2000 - 15:05:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods [From Josh] (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 10:51:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 18:14:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Stuff on Pentium memory barriers (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 15:07:26 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Rules on objects escaping their constructor (Thu Sep 14 2000 - 11:37:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: re: synchronized new (Wed Sep 13 2000 - 12:02:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Corner cases for final fields (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 12:24:31 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Do we need to bother with corner cases for final fields (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:24:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 16:52:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Java memory model workshop at OPPSLA (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 16:12:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:03:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Second call for participation in JMM workshop at OOPSLA (Wed Aug 23 2000 - 13:22:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Some C# thread code (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 11:04:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The "Double-Checked Locking is broken" declaration (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 21:56:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA workshop call for participation (Fri Jul 28 2000 - 17:15:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: From "Elements of Java Style".... :-( (Thu Jul 27 2000 - 16:16:37 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More on C# (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 10:48:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct string issue summary? (Thu Jul 20 2000 - 10:15:43 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Corner cases for final fields (Mon Jul 17 2000 - 13:15:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization constraints due to class initialization (Thu Jul 13 2000 - 12:02:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Holub's Rules to Live By (Thu Jun 29 2000 - 09:32:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Need to submit postings from same address as you are subscribed to (Wed Jun 28 2000 - 11:56:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More info on C# (Tue Jun 27 2000 - 15:11:14 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: C# Memory Model? (Tue Jun 27 2000 - 09:35:22 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 12:53:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Sat Jun 10 2000 - 22:32:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile spec complience tests (Wed May 31 2000 - 14:55:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile compliance (Wed May 31 2000 - 10:47:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JavaOne talk (Mon May 29 2000 - 11:09:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Double-check and Symantec JIT (Sat May 27 2000 - 19:15:20 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization overhead in Spec JVM 98 (Sat May 27 2000 - 18:52:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Double-check and Symantec JIT (Fri May 26 2000 - 15:32:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Replication of Problem on single processor? (Fri May 26 2000 - 11:31:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JavaOne talk (Fri May 26 2000 - 08:19:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM on clusters (Fri May 26 2000 - 07:11:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 22:07:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 20:23:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 14:25:30 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Stuff for new readers... (Wed May 24 2000 - 10:32:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Some notes on the DB benchmark (Tue May 23 2000 - 13:01:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word-tearing (Sun Apr 16 2000 - 07:51:36 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Javasoft bug reports (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 08:49:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA Workshop? (Thu Mar 30 2000 - 07:39:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA Workshop? (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 17:37:54 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JavaOne (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 13:49:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Rough draft of JSR to revise Java Thread spec (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 12:10:42 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Rough draft of JSR to revise Java Thread spec (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 11:06:41 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers must be run in a finalizer thread (Sun Mar 26 2000 - 10:30:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 11:54:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 09:47:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Explaination of litmus test V4 (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 22:15:27 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Explaination of litmus test V4 (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 17:49:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:03:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 10:04:13 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 17:14:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 17:00:52 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 16:43:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 14:16:21 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Correction to litmus test V4 (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 14:02:42 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Tue Mar 21 2000 - 22:49:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Tue Mar 21 2000 - 22:06:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update on Java Memory Model (Tue Mar 21 2000 - 22:01:52 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Issues in the real-time java spec (Tue Jan 25 2000 - 13:55:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Definitive citation for double-check idiom (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 15:29:06 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Pentium memory model (Sun Jan 16 2000 - 22:26:56 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finializers again (this is important) (Sun Jan 16 2000 - 20:58:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 15:02:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 13:46:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Mon Dec 13 1999 - 17:26:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Fri Dec 03 1999 - 09:48:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 16:59:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Sat Nov 27 1999 - 15:18:53 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Does everyone agree that volatile variables should be SC (Tue Nov 23 1999 - 12:01:19 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Writing email while you're sick to your stomach (Sun Nov 21 1999 - 16:45:56 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A couple of things... (Sun Nov 21 1999 - 13:52:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Sun Nov 21 1999 - 08:32:57 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Sat Nov 20 1999 - 19:18:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Summary of useless sync (Mon Nov 15 1999 - 09:31:40 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Summary of useless sync (Sun Nov 14 1999 - 23:03:03 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibits reordering (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 23:30:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibits reordering (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 22:34:33 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibits reordering (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 22:22:41 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Efficient class initialization is _very_ hard (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 21:26:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reflection (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 14:19:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More synchronization statistics (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 23:53:05 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More synchronization statistics (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 17:55:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 13:23:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Native code destroys code analysis? (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 13:21:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 23:12:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 23:09:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 17:07:00 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization in the spec benchmarks (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 13:55:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 12:26:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Cost of marking things volatile (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 12:22:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 22:27:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 22:21:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 18:57:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 14:33:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 11:32:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Sun Nov 07 1999 - 22:10:02 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Sun Nov 07 1999 - 16:51:58 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Sun Nov 07 1999 - 16:47:57 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Revisiting sleep loops and "useless" memory barriers (Sun Nov 07 1999 - 16:25:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Wed Oct 27 1999 - 11:55:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 18:31:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 17:03:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Loosing the global ordering (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 16:51:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protectedfields (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 16:26:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 18:33:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 17:22:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 14:43:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 13:24:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 10:00:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 21:31:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 14:51:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 13:26:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Some odds and ends (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 10:32:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Commentary on a new memory model for Java (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 10:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sat Oct 23 1999 - 20:59:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sat Oct 23 1999 - 14:01:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A new memory model for Java (Fri Oct 22 1999 - 15:35:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protectedfields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 16:56:09 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 16:19:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA BOF scheduling (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 15:30:50 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Wed Oct 20 1999 - 16:13:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Revised JVM98 statistics (Tue Oct 19 1999 - 15:40:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing atomic object creation on Alphas may be cheap (Thu Oct 14 1999 - 14:17:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing atomic object creation on Alphas may be cheap (Wed Oct 13 1999 - 11:44:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Implementing atomic object creation on Alphas may be cheap (Tue Oct 12 1999 - 22:43:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Mailing list was down over the weekend (Wed Sep 29 1999 - 09:26:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Slides from an MIT talk I gave now available (Wed Sep 22 1999 - 11:41:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Wed Aug 25 1999 - 10:38:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Tue Aug 24 1999 - 23:42:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: BOF at OOPSLA (Thu Aug 19 1999 - 19:02:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: public or private BOF at OOPSLA? (Wed Aug 18 1999 - 20:07:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Memory model BOF at OOPSLA (Wed Aug 18 1999 - 15:04:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: semantics and optimization of final fields (Tue Aug 17 1999 - 13:44:09 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: semantics and optimization of final fields (Tue Aug 17 1999 - 12:11:04 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Information about IA-64 memory operations (Fri Aug 13 1999 - 12:33:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: memoryModel BOF at OOPSLA? (Mon Aug 09 1999 - 15:36:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Efficient implementation of strong class initialization safety (Mon Aug 09 1999 - 14:26:30 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Trip report: initialization safety (Mon Aug 09 1999 - 14:26:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: 8/3 Bay area trip report (Mon Aug 09 1999 - 14:26:13 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: operation reorderings [Corrected] (Thu Jul 29 1999 - 11:03:35 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: operation reorderings (Wed Jul 28 1999 - 15:22:09 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reply to field cleared (Mon Jul 26 1999 - 15:13:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reply to field on mailing list (Mon Jul 26 1999 - 09:45:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Sat Jul 24 1999 - 15:54:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Sat Jul 24 1999 - 14:54:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA poster submission on weak memory models - chance to review (Fri Jul 23 1999 - 17:35:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Is "memory coherence" necessary in the new JMM? (Fri Jul 23 1999 - 17:04:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: quick opcodes unsafe under weak memory models (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 14:19:53 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile isn't used in most code (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 13:48:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: final isn't used much in the JDK, even when it could (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 11:49:14 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: alpha version of JavaMemoryModel-digest now available (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 10:57:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Should a read memory barrier flush a final value (Tue Jul 20 1999 - 22:52:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Tue Jul 20 1999 - 22:40:51 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Paper by Arvind on memory models that may be of interest (Mon Jul 19 1999 - 17:12:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile variables in a weak memory model (Sat Jul 17 1999 - 11:33:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation onrelaxed memory model machines (Sat Jul 17 1999 - 10:54:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 17:02:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 15:53:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: weak vs. strong class initialization safety (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 13:14:14 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Bypassing class initialization checks with quick opcodes (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 17:55:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Worries about JIT compilation and class loading on multiprocessors (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 17:30:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Worries about JIT compilation and class loading on multiprocessors (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 15:52:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Code in the JDK that fails under current memory model (Mon Jul 12 1999 - 14:40:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 17:54:35 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another place where the default value isn't acceptable (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 14:07:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Trip report from Sun East (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 11:01:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 11:00:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Comments on Sarita's suggested changes (Tue Jul 06 1999 - 09:14:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Introduction, class author responsibilities (was: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads) (Tue Jul 06 1999 - 08:50:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Cost of memory barriers, and the difficulty of removing them (Tue Jul 06 1999 - 08:54:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions (Sun Jul 04 1999 - 17:42:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Sun Jul 04 1999 - 17:37:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 16:27:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 10:11:31 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 22:40:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 08:07:52 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 08:03:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Java's insecure parallelism (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 10:03:29 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Lowering the stakes in this discussion (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 12:06:07 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Alpha Memory model doesn't support fast & safe OO languages (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 18:11:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:53:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:50:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: reminder: javaMemoryModel is archived.... (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:16:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: To race or not to race (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 14:55:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 14:33:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 13:06:49 EDT)
  • Re: Getting the ball rolling (Fri Jun 25 1999 - 13:53:04 EDT)
  • Re: spec for VM or language (Fri Jun 25 1999 - 11:47:37 EDT)
  • Audience of Java memory model mailing list (Thu Jun 24 1999 - 16:58:45 EDT)
  • Getting the ball rolling... (Thu Jun 24 1999 - 11:18:15 EDT)
• Blake Meike
  • JavaMemoryModel: status of "Multithreaded Semantics for Java, Revised" (Sun Jun 15 2003 - 18:25:35 EDT)
• Bob Lee
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 12:00:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:36:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 20:46:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 19:10:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Newbie Question (Tue Oct 28 2003 - 14:26:00 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Newbie Question (Tue Oct 28 2003 - 11:12:26 EST)
• Boehm, Hans
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Wed Aug 24 2005 - 14:29:57 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 20:24:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 13:46:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Tue May 03 2005 - 18:04:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Tue May 03 2005 - 15:15:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Tue May 03 2005 - 13:59:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 20:37:17 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 14:37:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 14:40:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 15:17:49 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 18:17:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 17:57:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 18:20:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 14:04:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 20:38:26 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:05:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another important finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 20:24:32 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 19:11:23 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Empty synchronized blocks are not useless (? ) (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 13:49:31 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:58:39 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 16:50:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 14:46:48 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 14:39:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 18:20:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 13:24:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread.stop() (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 12:59:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 18:10:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 17:20:22 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: What Causality test cases does the CLI/C# me mory model allow? (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 18:37:09 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronize s from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 19:12:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronize s from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 16:43:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: missing ingredient of volatile semantic (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 20:18:20 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about volatiles (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 16:38:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 19:27:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 18:53:23 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 12:39:58 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Thu Nov 20 2003 - 19:22:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Let them write race-free code (was: The prop erty of "race-free implies SC") (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:25:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 13:55:48 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 19:27:16 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 17:44:43 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 16:47:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: That gap again (Fri Aug 08 2003 - 13:25:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 a nd 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 19:44:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: How bad are incorrectly synchronized program s? (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 14:57:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: final fields, again (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 16:43:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: final fields, again (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 18:53:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 19:26:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:51:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 21:39:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Class Loaders and Garbage Collection (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 17:02:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Memory Model updates in the CLR (Thu May 22 2003 - 14:03:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu May 22 2003 - 12:51:30 EDT)
  • runFinalization (was: RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case f or finalizers) (Tue May 20 2003 - 15:28:22 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 11:54:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Mon May 19 2003 - 14:15:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu May 15 2003 - 15:16:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 22:07:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 19:07:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:07:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 15:59:26 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 15:20:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 14:44:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:33:10 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:51:27 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 16:27:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 15:25:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization (Fri Apr 04 2003 - 19:00:37 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Thu Apr 03 2003 - 17:37:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 13:40:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:36:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 20:25:02 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 19:42:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:53:22 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:28:19 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:08:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 16:05:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 14:38:41 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Mon Mar 31 2003 - 16:41:10 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 15:07:35 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 16:29:10 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 15:47:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 13:37:21 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization, again (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 13:27:52 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 17:13:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Finalization, again (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 16:50:29 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: ECMA CLI/C# spec (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 13:34:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Tue Oct 23 2001 - 14:09:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 18:55:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 15:54:14 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 15:10:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 20:29:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Wed Jul 18 2001 - 17:46:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: a naive proposal (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 14:09:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Wed Jul 11 2001 - 18:23:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write ? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 13:28:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 13:53:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 14:50:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 13:27:07 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:00:37 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: static singletons in C on win32 (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 12:33:54 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 21:21:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 20:45:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 17:24:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 14:27:53 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 13:30:35 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More on C# (Fri Jul 21 2000 - 13:53:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: C# Memory Model? (Tue Jun 27 2000 - 12:49:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 20:22:35 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 16:50:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers must be run in a finalizer thread (Mon Mar 27 2000 - 12:58:50 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 17:42:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 15:32:07 EST)
• Carr, Wayne
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 06:12:20 EDT)
  • RE: A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Thu May 27 2004 - 15:28:45 EDT)
  • A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Tue May 25 2004 - 21:00:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about volatiles (Tue Mar 23 2004 - 12:52:08 EST)
• Clark VERBRUGGE
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 09:56:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Mon Feb 10 2003 - 16:33:07 EST)
• Cliff Click
  • JavaMemoryModel: circular reasoning in compilers & memory models... (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 23:21:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 23:14:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: deleting dead volatile ref's (Sun Jul 14 2002 - 22:56:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: deleting dead volatile ref's (Thu Jul 11 2002 - 12:08:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 23:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 22:12:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 04 2002 - 12:59:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 13:01:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 11:54:54 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Mon Feb 04 2002 - 02:05:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Sat Feb 02 2002 - 23:18:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Fri Feb 01 2002 - 12:54:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Should we allow synchronized constructors? (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 00:12:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 12:50:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 11:03:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 23:03:03 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Array (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:07:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 23:25:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 11:43:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:34:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dependences: a concrete example (Sun Aug 12 2001 - 23:48:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 03:43:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 00:47:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 23:39:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 22:28:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 11:35:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 10:51:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handlevolatile reads-after-writes (Fri Nov 26 1999 - 22:12:45 EST)
• Clifford Click
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Fri Mar 08 2002 - 15:17:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 16:57:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 14:22:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Array (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:20:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 13:38:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Fri Sep 14 2001 - 14:04:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: javaworld on double-check (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:53:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 13:35:30 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: What do I do with volatiles? (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 19:50:08 EST)
• Craig Russell
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Thu Aug 18 2005 - 13:03:05 EDT)
• Dan Bornstein
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 21:05:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Fri Mar 04 2005 - 00:56:32 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 23:34:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Thu Oct 02 2003 - 12:48:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Wed Oct 01 2003 - 21:31:54 EDT)
• Dan Scales
  • JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 21:32:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 18:42:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Alpha Memory model doesn't support fast & safe OO languages (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 19:44:17 EDT)
• David Detlefs - Sun Microsystems Labs BOS
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 10:10:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 21:52:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 21:37:35 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM, escape analysis, lock elision (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 11:41:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are 'final' fields cause the GC to be more efficient? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 11:58:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 10:01:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:34:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 09:48:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:35:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 11:54:10 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 11:47:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 09:54:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibits reordering (Fri Nov 12 1999 - 10:01:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Native code destroys code analysis? (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 10:24:20 EST)
• David F. Bacon
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Mon Feb 17 2003 - 15:32:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:50:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 12:35:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sun Dec 03 2000 - 10:54:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn't? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 09:32:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A Better Way? (Mon Sep 11 2000 - 17:39:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 16:19:45 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 14:36:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 11:29:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Fri Dec 03 1999 - 12:01:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 09:52:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 07:38:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Wed Dec 01 1999 - 10:27:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Summary of useless sync (Mon Nov 15 1999 - 09:26:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 13:33:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 09:23:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 08:45:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 05:54:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 08:43:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 11:30:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 15:21:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Removal of Synchronization on Weakly Ordered Machines (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 12:06:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 16:31:08 EDT)
• David G. Wonnacott
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 10:05:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: class author responsibilities JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads) (Tue Jul 06 1999 - 11:18:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: class author responsibilities JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads) (Tue Jul 06 1999 - 11:08:11 EDT)
  • Introduction, class author responsibilities (was: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads) (Mon Jul 05 1999 - 10:01:02 EDT)
• David Holmes
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 19:22:12 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Thu Aug 18 2005 - 20:33:56 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 20:06:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 05:53:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 19:33:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 05:58:17 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 23:27:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 18:14:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 19:45:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 01:42:37 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 21:21:19 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: SoftReference not thread-safe ? (Wed Jan 19 2005 - 18:45:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of (Mon May 31 2004 - 00:26:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 23:14:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of (Sun May 30 2004 - 22:20:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 21:40:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 20:08:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 07:36:26 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Wed May 26 2004 - 18:46:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Wed May 19 2004 - 19:07:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 22:08:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 19:47:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Qualified this is final? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 08:22:31 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 08:08:43 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 22:25:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 19:53:48 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 02:04:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 18:47:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interactions with the environment and non-determinism (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 18:37:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 22:56:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 21:47:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interactions with the environment and non-determinism (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 20:20:57 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 19:17:16 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 17:16:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 06:25:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 06:15:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 21:01:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 19:50:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 19:53:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 19:19:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 23:53:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 19:36:27 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 19:30:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Sticking with happens-before (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 20:00:33 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 19:45:31 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 16:47:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: My final summary of strong vs. weak volatile semantics (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:52:53 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Sun Mar 21 2004 - 18:37:51 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:21:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 23:56:52 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 21:42:55 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: another question on volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 20:56:18 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 18:35:57 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 17:33:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 18:01:33 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 00:42:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 00:16:49 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 21:58:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 21:44:16 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 21:36:01 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 19:33:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 00:45:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 19:31:46 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 17:54:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Dec 29 2003 - 17:25:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 20:07:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: recap on threading models (Fri Dec 05 2003 - 18:17:18 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: recap on threading models (Fri Dec 05 2003 - 17:53:21 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 18:47:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 19:26:12 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 22:05:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 22:01:36 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 17:37:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 21:06:49 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 18:27:41 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 18:10:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Store/load barrier (Mon Oct 20 2003 - 18:47:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 22:21:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 20:04:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Thu Oct 02 2003 - 00:11:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 19:39:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 02:51:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization and the Java Memory Model (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:11:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Wed Aug 13 2003 - 19:45:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Mon Aug 11 2003 - 21:41:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Sun Aug 10 2003 - 18:38:52 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 23:38:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 19:43:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Tue Aug 05 2003 - 18:15:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 22:03:20 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 21:57:32 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 21:32:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A major problem with CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 21:16:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 19:34:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 02:57:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:41:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 19:20:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 00:14:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 03:12:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon Jun 09 2003 - 19:18:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 20:36:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Thu Jun 05 2003 - 19:07:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 06:56:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 06:43:14 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 00:33:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon May 26 2003 - 20:32:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:49:12 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:24:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 18:09:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Singleton question - and not about DCL! (Sun May 25 2003 - 21:27:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sun May 25 2003 - 19:13:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:41:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 19:35:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 01:06:57 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 00:22:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Double-Checked-Locking - revisited (Mon May 19 2003 - 23:53:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Memory Model updates in the CLR (Mon May 19 2003 - 22:13:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Class initialisation procedure: locks vs. volatiles (Sun Apr 13 2003 - 19:55:59 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 23:53:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 00:56:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 19:40:22 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 17:45:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 15:42:03 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 13:54:36 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 11:16:04 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Mon Mar 24 2003 - 07:21:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question: Why is it that Memory Models are Intuitively Hard? (Tue Feb 18 2003 - 18:01:10 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A simplified version of my model (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 19:21:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 15:30:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 13:53:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Mon Jul 22 2002 - 12:14:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Sun Jul 21 2002 - 16:56:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing formalization of "causal loop" safety (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 11:57:39 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: deleting dead volatile ref's (Sun Jul 14 2002 - 12:33:12 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JSR 133 Status report (Sun Jul 14 2002 - 12:08:26 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Final clarification on volatiles (Thu May 02 2002 - 22:28:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Wed May 01 2002 - 19:47:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Wed May 01 2002 - 00:46:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Tue Apr 30 2002 - 23:27:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile array references (Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:51:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Tue Apr 23 2002 - 18:22:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 23:41:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 22:29:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 21:23:59 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Thu Mar 14 2002 - 19:14:57 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 01:15:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: First reason on broken Double Check Locking (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 01:00:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 23:51:11 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 21:48:29 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Sun Mar 10 2002 - 18:58:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Sun Mar 10 2002 - 18:34:26 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Fri Mar 08 2002 - 00:30:50 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Thu Mar 07 2002 - 17:18:40 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Native code and the changing of final fields (Sun Jan 06 2002 - 19:24:55 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Sat Jan 05 2002 - 01:14:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 17:41:37 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 21:37:56 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 18:03:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 02:18:49 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization, again (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 21:19:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Tue Jan 01 2002 - 21:10:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: ECMA CLI/C# spec (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 23:16:12 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 23:20:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 18:45:31 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Sun Oct 21 2001 - 20:59:35 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 18:53:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 21:36:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 19:49:08 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 21:22:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Thu Aug 23 2001 - 19:41:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Mon Aug 06 2001 - 17:32:15 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barrie rs (Fri Jul 13 2001 - 18:03:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply mor e reliable software (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 20:27:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply mor e reliable software (Wed Jul 11 2001 - 19:35:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A performance argument against acquire/relea se ordering, a call for a quantitative approach, and a naive proposal (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 20:02:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply mor e reliable software (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 19:40:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barrie rs (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 19:33:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Sun Jul 08 2001 - 20:28:26 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Thu Jun 28 2001 - 23:09:59 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: TheServerSide.com: EJBean Class Initiali zation Hooks (Sun Jun 24 2001 - 19:02:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 18:11:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 22:19:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 18:24:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final and fixing the immutable String problem (Tue May 15 2001 - 22:21:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final and fixing the immutable String problem (Tue May 15 2001 - 21:21:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final and fixing the immutable String problem (Tue May 15 2001 - 19:27:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 21:17:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:57:29 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 19:31:11 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Native methods and Final fields (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 18:00:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Native methods and Final fields (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 22:24:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 00:18:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 21:49:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 23:31:21 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 20:47:59 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 17:38:43 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Sat Dec 16 2000 - 06:59:43 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sun Dec 03 2000 - 17:34:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Some C# thread code (Sun Jul 30 2000 - 22:46:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: C# Memory Model? (Wed Jun 28 2000 - 00:06:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 20:02:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 18:47:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Fri May 26 2000 - 00:58:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 20:56:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 19:03:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 18:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 18:24:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 18:16:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Wed May 24 2000 - 22:43:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Definitive citation for double-check idiom (Sun Jan 23 2000 - 16:39:31 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Mon Dec 20 1999 - 17:13:07 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 16:53:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A couple of things... (Sun Nov 21 1999 - 17:02:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibitsreordering (Sun Nov 14 1999 - 16:24:11 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibitsreordering (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 23:58:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibitsreordering (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 22:53:55 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:29:58 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 17:45:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 16:47:14 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 16:36:44 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 16:19:03 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 20:50:53 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 19:53:52 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 20:32:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 20:22:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: final isn't used much in the JDK, even when it could (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 18:34:26 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 22:21:49 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 23:20:23 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 18:49:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 23:29:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 23:46:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 00:48:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Alpha Memory model doesn't support fast (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 22:58:44 EDT)
• David Hovemeyer
  • JavaMemoryModel: Announce: Bug pattern detector for Java (Tue Apr 15 2003 - 17:22:27 EDT)
• David P Grove
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:40:28 EDT)
• David Smiley
  • JavaMemoryModel: Employing copy-on-write & avoiding double-check idiom (Tue Oct 30 2001 - 10:49:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Mon Jul 09 2001 - 16:58:16 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: TheServerSide.com: EJBean Class Initialization Hooks (Fri Jun 22 2001 - 10:02:03 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: TheServerSide.com: EJBean Class Initialization Hooks (Fri Jun 22 2001 - 09:51:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 17:26:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 09:37:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 15:31:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 13:40:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 09:03:40 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 14:30:14 EST)
• David W. Smiley
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 14:59:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: re: Threading issues in my connection pool (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 15:19:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 10:53:03 EDT)
• Dennis Sosnoski
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 01:19:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:46:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 13:56:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 01:24:21 EDT)
• DONNIE HALE
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New function needed in java.lang.Thread? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 12:47:27 EDT)
• Doron Rajwan
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are 'final' fields cause the GC to be more efficient? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 08:04:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized gettes (Wed Apr 28 2004 - 07:16:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Deliberate undersynchronization (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 15:22:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 00:25:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Object.hashCode() and System.identityHashCode() (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 07:34:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Object.hashCode() and System.identityHashCode() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 18:16:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 15:59:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 15:51:13 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 15:19:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Empty synchronized blocks are not useless (?) (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 11:42:32 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Intentional data race in String.hashCode() (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 02:13:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 01:51:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 01:41:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 14:40:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:27:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Sun Apr 04 2004 - 05:18:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:33:29 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Bugs in Tiger beta 1 (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 15:18:43 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will String be secure? (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:32:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 02:15:03 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Out-of-scope variables and finalization (Sat Oct 18 2003 - 10:49:16 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Out-of-scope variables and finalization (Fri Oct 17 2003 - 17:59:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why not delegate System.in/out/err, instead of see it as special case? (Sun Oct 05 2003 - 00:35:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Why not delegate System.in/out/err, instead of see it as special case? (Fri Oct 03 2003 - 15:36:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak memory model implementation with final fields (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:50:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak memory model implementation with final fields (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:27:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Weak memory model implementation with final fields (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:26:13 EDT)
• Doug Lea
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Wed May 04 2005 - 20:11:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Tue May 03 2005 - 15:00:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are 'final' fields cause the GC to be more efficient? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 17:03:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 06:42:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: transient final fields and deserialization (Sat Jun 12 2004 - 11:41:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 18:56:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final fields and deserialization (Wed May 12 2004 - 15:06:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 08:08:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 20:00:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 15:57:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 19:22:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Tiger beta1 ConcurrentHashMap bug? (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 06:31:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: "synchronizes with" (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 08:10:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about volatiles (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 19:02:20 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 07:47:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:59:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 17:51:25 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 10:55:49 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 07:56:41 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will String be secure? (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 07:19:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 08:15:33 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 18:19:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Typo in Case 9 and Case 9a? (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 07:48:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Test case 15 (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 09:23:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 19:31:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 08:36:54 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Mon Dec 01 2003 - 19:50:41 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Fri Nov 28 2003 - 08:47:43 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Fri Nov 28 2003 - 07:40:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 10:20:58 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 09:58:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 20:42:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 08:56:23 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Sun Nov 23 2003 - 09:13:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Sun Nov 23 2003 - 07:58:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Sun Nov 23 2003 - 07:16:54 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Sat Nov 22 2003 - 19:54:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 07:38:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Wed Nov 19 2003 - 09:37:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Wed Nov 19 2003 - 09:14:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 20:20:07 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Sun Nov 16 2003 - 09:14:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Thu Nov 06 2003 - 19:34:43 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Thu Nov 06 2003 - 13:20:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 10:37:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 20:39:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 09:45:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Mon Oct 20 2003 - 08:32:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: how to insert a memory barrier when using java.nio shared memory? (Sun Oct 12 2003 - 10:23:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Mon Aug 11 2003 - 06:54:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Sun Aug 10 2003 - 10:29:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Sun Aug 10 2003 - 09:05:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Fri Aug 08 2003 - 09:00:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 09:05:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: AtomicXArrays (Mon Aug 04 2003 - 11:37:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How bad are incorrectly synchronized programs? (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 08:31:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 21:13:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 08:47:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 13:24:53 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 12:20:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 11:08:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JSR-133 Cookbook for compiler writers (Fri Dec 06 2002 - 12:27:17 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Wed Dec 04 2002 - 13:04:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Tue Dec 03 2002 - 20:46:54 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Mon Dec 02 2002 - 11:26:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JSR-133 Cookbook for compiler writers (Sun Dec 01 2002 - 10:30:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft JSR-133 Cookbook for compiler writers (Fri Nov 29 2002 - 11:08:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Fri Apr 19 2002 - 06:15:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Fri Feb 08 2002 - 07:49:14 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR 166 (Concurrency utilities) (Fri Jan 25 2002 - 17:13:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:50:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 16:01:17 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 15:22:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 10:37:19 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:04:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Oops... Forgot non-atomic volatile writes (Thu Dec 20 2001 - 19:59:45 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Employing copy-on-write & avoiding double-check idiom (Tue Oct 30 2001 - 20:39:02 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Tue Oct 23 2001 - 07:27:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 19:40:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 18:18:53 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Atomic classes (was: New function needed in java.lang.Thread?) (Thu Aug 23 2001 - 08:01:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Fri Aug 10 2001 - 12:12:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Fri Aug 10 2001 - 08:16:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Mon Jul 23 2001 - 08:22:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Sun Jul 22 2001 - 10:59:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Tue Jul 17 2001 - 21:32:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel volatile ordering and the optimistic readers trans (Tue Jul 17 2001 - 21:31:35 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 11:37:19 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Mon Mar 26 2001 - 22:12:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Sun Mar 25 2001 - 09:33:00 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Sat Mar 24 2001 - 13:53:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: javaworld on double-check (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 12:24:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 07:54:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 20:46:20 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 20:29:42 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 08:39:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 07:52:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 09:10:42 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 09:10:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 08:10:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 20:41:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 12:44:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 12:21:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 10:28:38 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: static singletons in C on win32 (Mon Jan 08 2001 - 10:19:08 EST)
  • Re: Double null check sync problem fix. (Sun Dec 17 2000 - 14:18:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 09:08:53 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Empirical benefits of strong volatile rules (Sat Nov 25 2000 - 16:11:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn't? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 20:08:31 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' t? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 19:59:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Sat Nov 04 2000 - 09:00:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Tue Oct 31 2000 - 12:50:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Fri Oct 06 2000 - 19:52:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 07:53:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 07:24:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Fri Sep 29 2000 - 08:40:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 19:45:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 08:10:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Some C# thread code (Mon Jul 31 2000 - 07:35:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Dealing with scopes in real-time Java (Fri Jul 07 2000 - 08:16:11 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Dealing with scopes in real-time Java (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 09:24:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Holub's Rules to Live By (Thu Jun 29 2000 - 14:49:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JavaOne talk (Mon May 29 2000 - 08:50:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: serialization and finals (Sat Apr 22 2000 - 08:08:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word-tearing (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 19:22:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Word-tearing (Sat Apr 15 2000 - 14:51:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JavaOne (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 19:27:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA Workshop? (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 18:29:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 12:30:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 12:26:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 07:11:17 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Fri Mar 24 2000 - 07:02:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Explaination of litmus test V4 (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 20:09:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 15:50:43 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 09:42:19 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 07:21:02 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 12:58:20 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Schedule for changing the JavaMemoryModel (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 13:44:16 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: paper announcement (Tue Jan 18 2000 - 07:33:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: recap: concurrent reads (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 19:17:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Sat Dec 04 1999 - 11:46:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: recap: concurrent reads (Fri Dec 03 1999 - 09:06:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Fri Dec 03 1999 - 06:29:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 08:36:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Wed Dec 01 1999 - 12:25:04 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Wed Dec 01 1999 - 08:56:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Mon Nov 29 1999 - 19:31:07 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Sun Nov 28 1999 - 07:38:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Fri Nov 26 1999 - 20:56:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Tue Nov 23 1999 - 08:55:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Sun Nov 21 1999 - 10:25:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: An incomplete case for multiple models (Sat Nov 13 1999 - 09:26:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibits reordering (Fri Nov 12 1999 - 07:07:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More synchronization statistics (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 07:11:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 19:27:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 09:12:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 07:52:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 07:08:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 19:35:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 19:07:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 08:47:07 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 08:13:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 07:46:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Dropping coherence is more complicated than we thought (Sun Nov 07 1999 - 19:54:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Thu Oct 28 1999 - 10:16:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Wed Oct 27 1999 - 07:18:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 18:15:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 10:51:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 07:27:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Some odds and ends (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 15:14:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Some odds and ends (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 14:18:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sat Oct 23 1999 - 18:49:51 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 05:23:08 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Wed Oct 20 1999 - 18:36:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: real-time java spec (Wed Sep 29 1999 - 19:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Mon Aug 30 1999 - 07:11:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: cost of initialization-safety on an Alpha SMP (Sat Aug 28 1999 - 20:18:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Thu Aug 26 1999 - 07:01:30 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Wed Aug 25 1999 - 06:15:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Empirical data on cost of barriers in Cilk (Sat Jul 31 1999 - 10:50:37 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The final word (fat chance) on final (Thu Jul 29 1999 - 11:34:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Sat Jul 24 1999 - 16:34:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Sat Jul 24 1999 - 15:37:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Sat Jul 24 1999 - 11:26:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 21:22:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 18:42:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 16:51:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 14:46:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jul 05 1999 - 11:09:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 07:39:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 11:54:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 11:46:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 07:16:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 12:37:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 10:38:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Fri Jun 25 1999 - 20:30:13 EDT)
• Eliot Moss
  • JavaMemoryModel: Please move JMM discussion to javamemorymodel-discussion@mimsy.cs.umd.edu (Wed Aug 24 2005 - 14:00:29 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 11:21:23 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 12:06:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are 'final' fields cause the GC to be more efficient? (Sun Apr 24 2005 - 15:43:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 20:01:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Fri May 28 2004 - 12:24:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: more suggestions (Tue May 18 2004 - 12:48:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 10:10:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sat May 15 2004 - 19:21:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 16:29:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:45:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:22:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 17:12:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 09:18:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 21:34:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 14:11:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: allowed semantics question (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 06:49:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: allowed semantics question (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 22:48:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 17:08:27 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 06:51:35 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 21:38:49 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Sun Oct 26 2003 - 06:45:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 22:26:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak memory model implementation with final fields (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:37:43 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Weak memory model implementation with final fields (Fri Sep 19 2003 - 16:15:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: an operational model? (Sun Aug 03 2003 - 01:50:03 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Hoist by my own petard; the real difference between 5 & 6 (Sun Aug 03 2003 - 01:29:30 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 21:58:43 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: tiny detail: intra-thread semantics or unithread semantics (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 21:36:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: PDA JVM and Linux OS Crash (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 07:10:04 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Cookbook: barriers (Mon Mar 17 2003 - 09:06:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 21:21:04 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 12:57:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Sun Feb 03 2002 - 16:34:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Fri Feb 01 2002 - 13:54:24 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: (Non)-Usefulness of data races on NON_VOLATILE fields (Wed Jan 30 2002 - 11:14:06 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Non-atomic volatile writes (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 15:30:48 EST)
• Eric Williams
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 08:14:46 EST)
• Evan Ireland
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 22:58:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Thu May 20 2004 - 23:57:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Wed May 19 2004 - 23:45:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final fields and deserialization (Tue May 11 2004 - 19:47:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:31:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 02:36:59 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will String be secure? (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:58:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 13:53:49 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 18:47:44 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Mon Dec 01 2003 - 18:22:56 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 18:04:47 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 15:06:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 22:34:27 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 22:33:05 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 16:41:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 14:37:23 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:11:15 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Mon Nov 10 2003 - 22:59:18 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Mon Oct 20 2003 - 17:58:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 21:21:25 EDT)
  • RE: [moss@cs.umass.edu: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects] (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 18:06:03 EDT)
  • RE: [Matthew.Ford@forward.com.au: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects] (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 18:02:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Out-of-scope variables and finalization (Sun Oct 19 2003 - 16:25:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 00:22:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization and the Java Memory Model (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 22:17:31 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization and the Java Memory Model (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:30:24 EDT)
• Fang Wei Jian
  • JavaMemoryModel: Do getfield/putfield correspond to use/assign or load/store? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 01:03:04 EST)
• Fang Weijian
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 21:27:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: An incorrectly synchronized case (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 08:13:48 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: An incorrectly synchronized case (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 04:52:22 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Wed Nov 12 2003 - 07:52:04 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 07:02:12 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 01:57:57 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Current stage of proposed Java memory model? (Thu Mar 14 2002 - 22:56:21 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Current stage of proposed Java memory model? (Wed Mar 13 2002 - 23:38:16 EST)
• forwarding from Joshua Bloch
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Corner cases for final fields (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 16:25:06 EDT)
• Frank Peters
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question regarding causality&In-Reply-To=<42057579.80200> (Sun Feb 06 2005 - 12:04:04 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question regarding causality (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 04:39:54 EST)
• Ganesh C. Gopalakrishnan
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executable Specifications (Thu Apr 04 2002 - 15:31:33 EST)
• Glenn Vanderburg
  • JavaMemoryModel: Concurrency Utilities BOF at JavaOne (Fri Mar 15 2002 - 01:01:19 EST)
• gordon_hutchison@uk.ibm.com
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 04:14:46 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 06:25:17 EDT)
• Gregory Thain
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: C# Memory Model? (Tue Jun 27 2000 - 12:13:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Double-check and Symantec JIT (Fri May 26 2000 - 16:53:14 EDT)
• Guang R Gao
  • JavaMemoryModel: Bill's model and LC (Fri Oct 29 1999 - 15:20:07 EDT)
• Hamann, Chad M
  • JavaMemoryModel: Current status of proposed memory model (Mon Aug 07 2000 - 13:47:31 EDT)
• Hans Boehm
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 21:42:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 21:38:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 17:55:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 14:58:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 14:43:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 14:37:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 02:15:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 01:50:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 01:58:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 01:25:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Programmer Oriented FAQ (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 23:59:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Causality Test (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 22:27:54 EST)
• Hans Wegener
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sun Jun 27 1999 - 12:23:55 EDT)
• Hanson Char
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: SoftReference not thread-safe ? (Wed Jan 19 2005 - 17:03:54 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: SoftReference not thread-safe ? (Wed Jan 19 2005 - 15:39:44 EST)
• Hong Zhang
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handlevolatile reads-after-writes (Mon Nov 29 1999 - 13:22:12 EST)
• Hudson, Rick
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Thu Dec 11 2003 - 11:00:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Oops... Forgot non-atomic volatile write s (Fri Dec 21 2001 - 09:46:19 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' t (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 17:59:20 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' t (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 12:14:35 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' t? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 10:33:14 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn't? (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 08:55:44 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel:(Official) Good news on IA-64 (Wed Feb 16 2000 - 09:26:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 11:30:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A new memory model for Java (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 09:10:00 EDT)
• Igor Pechtchanski
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:42:41 EST)
• James Sinnamon
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Sun Feb 09 2003 - 19:58:29 EST)
• Jan-Willem Maessen
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 14:47:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 17:37:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are the volatile semantics strong enough? (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 17:06:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Fri Sep 14 2001 - 10:18:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Thu Sep 13 2001 - 16:02:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Wed Sep 12 2001 - 18:38:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Wed Sep 12 2001 - 16:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of locks and volatiles (Sun Jul 01 2001 - 17:54:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 12:07:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 23:50:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 22:23:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 15:38:47 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 14:00:55 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Sat Oct 07 2000 - 11:13:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Oct 03 2000 - 12:12:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 09:22:10 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Corner cases for final fields (Tue Sep 12 2000 - 11:51:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 19:05:52 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatile and Final semantics, etc. (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 16:49:56 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Wed Oct 27 1999 - 16:10:30 EDT)
• Jean-Philippe Lesot
  • JavaMemoryModel: Array (Mon Dec 10 2001 - 09:22:13 EST)
• Jeff Bogda
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:43:01 EST)
• Jeffrey G. Bogda
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 19:34:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Oct 02 2000 - 16:19:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Wed Sep 27 2000 - 13:59:47 EDT)
• Jeremy Manson
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 10:26:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 12:57:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 23:30:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 15:32:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 02:36:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 20:35:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sat Apr 30 2005 - 18:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM, escape analysis, lock elision (Mon Apr 25 2005 - 12:08:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Fri Mar 04 2005 - 00:16:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Serialization and final fields - what happened? (Thu Mar 03 2005 - 22:27:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 19:13:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 16:45:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question regarding causality (Sat Feb 05 2005 - 20:40:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: SoftReference not thread-safe ? (Wed Jan 19 2005 - 17:47:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: SoftReference not thread-safe ? (Wed Jan 19 2005 - 16:40:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Sequential consistency (Thu Dec 09 2004 - 17:46:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reference on "Correctly synchronized programs are sequentially consistent" (Fri Aug 13 2004 - 13:14:54 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Tue May 18 2004 - 14:16:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: more suggestions (Tue May 18 2004 - 13:35:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 23:57:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 10:45:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 17:47:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 11:22:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sat May 15 2004 - 21:14:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Thu Apr 29 2004 - 17:00:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 16:13:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JavaOne 2004 Presentation (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 14:34:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Object.hashCode() and System.identityHashCode() (Sun Apr 18 2004 - 11:30:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Object.hashCode() and System.identityHashCode() (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 20:04:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Non SC behaviour using volatiles. (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 23:52:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 19:17:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 10:00:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 19:28:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 15:14:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 14:52:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 22:25:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Mon Apr 12 2004 - 21:27:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: There is _NO_ interaction between the memory model and synchronous exceptions (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 11:45:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 10:32:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 10:24:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 22:41:50 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Mon Apr 05 2004 - 15:38:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Sat Mar 27 2004 - 10:50:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about volatiles (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 00:49:43 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Definition of volatile revisited (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:38:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Definition of volatile revisited (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 10:23:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:49:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are correctly synchronized code fragment executions SC? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 10:26:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: allowed semantics question (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 23:33:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 13:56:22 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 11:47:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:32:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Experimental Memory Model Without Forbidden Executions (Tue Feb 24 2004 - 14:52:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 00:32:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 00:07:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Sun Feb 22 2004 - 23:43:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Clarification: Acquire/Release Semantics On Volatile Read/Write Is New? (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 00:23:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 00:15:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Sat Feb 21 2004 - 00:12:12 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Programmer Oriented FAQ (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 16:58:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 15:45:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Comments on JSR-133 document (Feb 2, 2004) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 22:39:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Causality Test 16 (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 18:26:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Causality Test 16 (Fri Dec 19 2003 - 01:15:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Thu Dec 11 2003 - 01:18:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 21:18:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 20:57:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 10:59:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 17:57:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 23:19:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 15:17:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How figure 2 example is forbidden by the original JMM (Wed Nov 12 2003 - 15:32:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prescient reads unnecessary? (Wed Nov 12 2003 - 13:04:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Newbie Question (Tue Oct 28 2003 - 15:20:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Wed Oct 01 2003 - 23:26:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:29:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:46:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 01:10:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Update to memory model (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:52:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization and the Java Memory Model (Tue Sep 02 2003 - 21:08:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 10:44:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final fields, again (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 20:23:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:48:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:59:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executors, Thread Pools and Isolation (Mon May 19 2003 - 10:57:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question: Why is it that Memory Models are Intuitively Hard? (Tue Feb 18 2003 - 01:00:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Mon Feb 17 2003 - 02:52:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Tue Feb 11 2003 - 22:40:41 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Sun Feb 09 2003 - 21:21:08 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Executable Specifications (Thu Apr 04 2002 - 12:08:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Mon Mar 25 2002 - 16:12:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 19:08:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 14:17:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 12:08:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 10:54:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 00:05:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Issue with final fields (Sat Feb 02 2002 - 16:55:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Wed Dec 12 2001 - 17:24:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Array (Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:05:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Sun Oct 21 2001 - 13:43:17 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Mon Jul 02 2001 - 14:04:10 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of final and fixing the immutable String problem (Tue May 15 2001 - 20:45:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of Multithreaded Java (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:47:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of Multithreaded Java (Mon May 14 2001 - 15:28:03 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Questions about the proposed semantics (Wed May 09 2001 - 11:33:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 18:48:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 18:07:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 17:59:32 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 10:36:44 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 10:09:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 09:55:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 14:05:57 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 14:50:57 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Do getfield/putfield correspond to use/assign or load/store? (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 11:28:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 20:27:27 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:15:23 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn't (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 13:35:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 12:21:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles - where does SC work and PO doesn' (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 11:32:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What do I do with volatiles? (Fri Nov 17 2000 - 22:10:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Tue Sep 26 2000 - 11:43:34 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 21:36:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 13:24:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Wed Sep 06 2000 - 13:10:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: re: Threading issues in my connection pool (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 16:13:57 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 11:45:02 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: From "Elements of Java Style".... (Sat Jul 29 2000 - 00:15:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers must be run in a finalizer thread (Sun Mar 26 2000 - 14:19:20 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Is reordering of dependent reads on Alpha actually possible? (Tue Feb 29 2000 - 15:30:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Is reordering of dependent reads on Alpha actually possible? (Fri Feb 25 2000 - 13:24:51 EST)
• Jerry Schwarz
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Thu May 27 2004 - 18:05:23 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Thu May 27 2004 - 13:33:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Wed May 26 2004 - 22:48:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 12:54:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 21:15:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 16:30:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 12:16:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:30:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 17:09:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 17:53:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 00:01:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Javadoc terminology for synchronization (Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:37:22 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronize s from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 19:42:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:14:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 13:14:08 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 21:04:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New Causality Test (Tue Feb 10 2004 - 20:23:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I want to prohibit test cases 5 and 10 (Thu Jan 22 2004 - 23:04:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I want to prohibit test cases 5 and 10 (Thu Jan 22 2004 - 22:55:14 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 15:44:25 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:53:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Sat Dec 27 2003 - 22:59:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Mon Dec 01 2003 - 16:41:02 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 16:25:18 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 15:32:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 15:25:22 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Fri Nov 07 2003 - 15:00:41 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 18:54:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 19:34:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Data races should not be the buffer overflow of the 21st century (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:28:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 13:11:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 05:50:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 03:36:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 17:00:19 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Class Loaders and Garbage Collection (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 18:01:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 23:45:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 13:15:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu May 22 2003 - 14:07:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 15:47:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 13:47:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 18:33:57 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 16:13:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:25:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 19:09:04 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:27:48 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 13:32:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Fri Jul 26 2002 - 15:01:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 13:57:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Sat Jul 13 2002 - 20:23:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 12:51:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Tue Mar 12 2002 - 10:46:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Fri Mar 08 2002 - 13:08:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Thu Mar 07 2002 - 18:11:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Should we allow synchronized constructors? (Mon Jan 07 2002 - 14:15:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 14:31:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 15:43:09 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 13:12:48 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:54:50 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 14:19:44 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 20:56:32 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 20:24:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 19:50:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 16:08:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How relaxed should our memory model be? (Fri Oct 05 2001 - 18:22:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 17:12:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 21:11:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Thu Sep 13 2001 - 19:09:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Fri Aug 03 2001 - 15:47:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 15:50:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 20:25:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Sat Sep 30 2000 - 15:10:59 EDT)
• jmanson@cs.umd.edu
  • JavaMemoryModel: Newer revisions (Fri Oct 17 2003 - 11:28:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New Updated Documents (Thu Oct 16 2003 - 11:55:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final fields, again (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 17:26:46 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM Beta version (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 15:14:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 12:48:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 22:18:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Class Loaders and Garbage Collection (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 17:20:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Class Loaders and Garbage Collection (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 15:43:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Fri May 23 2003 - 17:03:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Draft of Complete Memory Model now available! (Wed May 21 2003 - 16:52:25 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Executors, Thread Pools and Isolation (Fri May 16 2003 - 15:12:29 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New Semantics for Final Fields (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 12:30:52 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sun Feb 16 2003 - 20:12:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sun Feb 16 2003 - 12:33:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sat Feb 15 2003 - 21:12:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Mon Feb 10 2003 - 22:16:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Tue Feb 04 2003 - 11:43:58 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Can final fields change? (Sat Oct 05 2002 - 14:04:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 00:24:31 EDT)
• Joe Bowbeer
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 22:01:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM discussions moving to https://javamemorymodel.dev.java.net/ (Tue Aug 23 2005 - 13:17:02 EDT)
• Joe Emporium
  • JavaMemoryModel: First reason on broken Double Check Locking (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 23:26:29 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 23:23:59 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Double-Checked Locking is Broken (Sun Feb 10 2002 - 17:32:31 EST)
• Joe Hendrix
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Thu Nov 06 2003 - 14:13:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Tue May 27 2003 - 03:25:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon May 26 2003 - 15:49:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 05:48:29 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Executable specifications (Wed May 07 2003 - 02:04:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Actions and GUIDs (Tue Feb 18 2003 - 02:07:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Wed Feb 05 2003 - 04:40:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OK, time to get moving again (Sat Feb 01 2003 - 15:56:21 EST)
• Joel Jones
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 08:41:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 23:53:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Final Means Different Things To VM and Java Language. Does That Impact JITs? (Tue Sep 30 2003 - 21:31:06 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reading List for lurkers (Fri Aug 06 1999 - 13:01:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 19:16:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 12:06:06 EDT)
• Jon Skeet
  • JavaMemoryModel: Singleton question - and not about DCL! (Tue May 20 2003 - 02:59:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Wed Mar 19 2003 - 17:40:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Fri Aug 02 2002 - 06:06:10 EDT)
• Jonathan Mark J Lingard
  • JavaMemoryModel: PDA JVM and Linux OS Crash (Thu Jul 24 2003 - 04:46:45 EDT)
• Jose Nelson Amaral
  • JavaMemoryModel: LC model and LC cache protocol (Fri Nov 12 1999 - 12:36:45 EST)
• Joseph Bowbeer
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 15:57:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 02:40:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 00:09:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 19:41:50 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What Causality test cases does the CLI/C# memory model allow? (Tue Mar 30 2004 - 15:35:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 17:46:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 02:06:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 16:50:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Bugs in Tiger beta 1 (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 22:42:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 15:16:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 21:00:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 18:47:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Mon Nov 24 2003 - 17:26:07 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Let them write race-free code (was: The property of "race-free implies SC") (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 01:00:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics vs. compiler optimizations (Sun Aug 03 2003 - 18:31:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: required reads and writes (was: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10) (Sat Aug 02 2003 - 18:16:31 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: required reads and writes (was: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10) (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 23:24:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 19:32:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 19:21:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 18:41:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New one page version of Manson/Pugh core model (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 05:35:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Updated JMM (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 17:08:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 15:50:05 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 17:26:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 13:51:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Sat Apr 05 2003 - 17:02:12 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Question: Why is it that Memory Models are Intuitively Hard? (Tue Feb 18 2003 - 02:09:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sun Feb 16 2003 - 01:35:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sat Feb 15 2003 - 17:45:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Tue Apr 23 2002 - 19:07:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:09:47 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: OT: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:00:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Fri Jan 04 2002 - 17:04:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 02:46:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 01:47:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Tue Oct 23 2001 - 14:21:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New function needed in java.lang.Thread? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 14:00:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Sun Jul 22 2001 - 13:18:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Sat Jul 07 2001 - 20:39:59 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Thu Jun 28 2001 - 03:52:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Thu Jun 28 2001 - 03:22:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR-133 Voting Results (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:40:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: non-finals with synchronized getters (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 21:04:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Summary: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 19:41:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: movement into synchronized blocks (Sat Mar 31 2001 - 16:31:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:58:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:54:54 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:32:20 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 05:50:21 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:50:23 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: movement into synchronized blocks (Fri Mar 30 2001 - 01:44:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 20:15:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Thu Mar 29 2001 - 13:07:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM problems with latch or copy-on-write? (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:09:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Immutablity and Final Fields (Mon Mar 05 2001 - 17:10:13 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 01:41:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 23:21:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 01:13:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 02:55:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 02:00:10 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: singleton of the week (Tue Nov 21 2000 - 16:48:04 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: singleton q-of-week (Sun Nov 19 2000 - 19:36:45 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 20:56:45 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: init methods (Mon Sep 25 2000 - 15:07:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 07:38:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: re: Threading issues in my connection pool (Tue Sep 05 2000 - 16:25:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu Jun 01 2000 - 03:43:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 05:50:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Immutable objects which aren't immutable (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 08:46:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JavaOne (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 16:05:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: javaMemoryModel: volatile, final, etc. (Mon Mar 27 2000 - 02:58:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Schedule for changing the JMM (Sat Jan 22 2000 - 18:52:32 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Schedule for changing the JavaMemoryModel (Thu Jan 20 2000 - 02:52:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finializers again (this is important) (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 03:58:56 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: real-time java spec (Thu Jan 06 2000 - 15:55:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 08:44:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protectedfields (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 16:16:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 02:55:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 15:23:37 EDT)
  • Re #2: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sat Oct 23 1999 - 20:02:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Sat Oct 23 1999 - 15:15:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protectedfields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 16:51:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code in the JDK that fails under current memory model (Sun Jul 18 1999 - 18:00:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Sun Jul 18 1999 - 16:21:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 02:08:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code in the JDK that fails under current memory model (Tue Jul 13 1999 - 03:11:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 15:22:32 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 02:31:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 01:29:49 EDT)
• Joshua Bloch
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Sun Nov 23 2003 - 09:51:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:14:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 13:23:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 23:54:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Fri May 23 2003 - 17:26:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 16:11:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 15:04:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Tue May 20 2003 - 02:51:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Wed Apr 09 2003 - 14:21:59 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 13:45:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 12:37:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Mon Apr 07 2003 - 00:19:51 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers (Sun Apr 06 2003 - 14:25:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Java Class initialization can deadlock? (Thu Mar 20 2003 - 11:57:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: StringBuffer intensive codes/applications/benchmarks (Thu Apr 25 2002 - 12:26:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread starting in constructors (Mon Mar 11 2002 - 22:57:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Word tearing (Thu Jan 03 2002 - 00:31:13 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 00:00:39 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Tue Oct 23 2001 - 12:34:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Sat Dec 02 2000 - 01:32:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JavaOne (Wed Mar 29 2000 - 16:45:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizers must be run in a finalizer thread (Sun Mar 26 2000 - 12:26:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of finalize (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 01:36:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Memory model and finalize methods (Tue Dec 14 1999 - 14:25:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 13:17:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:19:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization in the spec benchmarks (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:18:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 01:19:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 01:04:54 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 14:50:07 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 14:34:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Fri Aug 27 1999 - 01:48:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Wed Aug 25 1999 - 06:18:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA poster submission on weak memory models - chance to review (Mon Jul 26 1999 - 01:55:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA poster submission on weak memory models - chance to review (Mon Jul 26 1999 - 01:51:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final isn't used much in the JDK, even when it could (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 16:47:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 15:23:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Argument for a strong memory model (Mon Jul 19 1999 - 02:38:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation onrelaxed memory model machines (Fri Jul 16 1999 - 17:10:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 03:34:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: proposal for semantics & implementation on relaxed memory model machines (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 03:11:39 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Worries about JIT compilation and class loading on multiprocessors (Thu Jul 15 1999 - 02:47:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code in the JDK that fails under current memory model (Mon Jul 12 1999 - 14:54:17 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 16:48:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Sat Jul 03 1999 - 01:51:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 14:04:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 03:25:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:01:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 14:56:38 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Rules that guarantee "Initialization Safety" (Sun Jun 27 1999 - 03:55:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Fri Jun 25 1999 - 21:43:54 EDT)
• Juergen Kreileder
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: On which JDK 1.4 VMs is "volatile access" already compliant with the proposed JDK 1.5 JMM? (Tue Jan 06 2004 - 14:16:42 EST)
• Kammy Wesley
  • JavaMemoryModel: [Fwd: double check article: what if constructor throws exception] (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 20:01:51 EDT)
• Keith Randall
  • JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 14:04:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:52:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 21:57:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Is reordering of dependent reads on Alpha actually possible? (Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:03:17 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Pentium memory model (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 15:57:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Most (all?) JVM's incorrectly handle volatile reads-after-writes (Mon Nov 29 1999 - 14:54:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Native code destroys code analysis? (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 17:55:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 18:09:17 EDT)
• Kelvin Nilsen
  • JavaMemoryModel: Real-Time Core Extensions vs. the new and improved Java Memory Model (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 01:47:16 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Dealing with scopes in real-time Java (Thu Jul 06 2000 - 23:24:28 EDT)
• Kevin Yip
  • JavaMemoryModel: Sequential consistency (Thu Dec 09 2004 - 19:41:14 EST)
• Kip Lubliner
  • JavaMemoryModel: more double-checked fun (Thu Nov 02 2000 - 10:45:01 EST)
• Kourosh Gharachorloo
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Tue Dec 03 2002 - 20:04:04 EST)
• Lanchon
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: recap on threading models (Fri Dec 05 2003 - 16:11:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Fri Dec 05 2003 - 05:49:48 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: recap on threading models (Fri Dec 05 2003 - 05:10:35 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Wed Nov 05 2003 - 15:06:29 EST)
• Marie Conte
  • JavaMemoryModel: my 2 cents (not that its worth that much) (Tue Nov 09 1999 - 11:51:38 EST)
• Mark Christiaens
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Revised report on the Java Memory Model (Thu May 30 2002 - 11:44:12 EDT)
• Martin Trotter
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 04:29:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 06:22:32 EDT)
  • Fw: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 06:17:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 05:17:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 05:31:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 04:50:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 04:01:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 05:50:07 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Spec on on wait and interrupts (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:46:09 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:31:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 11:59:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executors, Thread Pools and Isolation (Mon May 19 2003 - 09:04:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Mon May 19 2003 - 08:48:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Mon Apr 28 2003 - 05:21:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No "Spooky errors at a distance" (Fri Mar 08 2002 - 08:20:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 05:53:33 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 04:34:41 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 10:30:06 EDT)
• Matthew Ford
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Motivation and Semantics for Immutable objects (Mon Sep 22 2003 - 20:22:14 EDT)
• McLachlan, Paul
  • JavaMemoryModel: how to insert a memory barrier when using java.nio shared memory? (Tue Oct 07 2003 - 13:50:01 EDT)
• Mehra, Pankaj
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR133-related division of labor between javac and JVM (Mon Jul 12 2004 - 02:05:28 EDT)
• Mike Marchywka
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: We need your litmus tests (Mon Sep 24 2001 - 12:24:56 EDT)
• Miles Sabin
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 15:16:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Mar 07 2004 - 12:30:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 10:11:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sat Jan 31 2004 - 20:26:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 14:22:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 04:19:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executors, Thread Pools and Isolation (Sat May 17 2003 - 02:35:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Ownership Types for Safe Programming (was: Disallowing badly synchronized programs) (Sun Feb 16 2003 - 03:39:54 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Fri Apr 19 2002 - 08:28:57 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Fri Apr 19 2002 - 08:14:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 18 2002 - 10:04:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Wed Jan 02 2002 - 14:19:06 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Fairness Guarantees in the Memory Model? (Mon Oct 22 2001 - 17:23:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:05:44 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply mor e reliable software (Thu Jul 12 2001 - 02:59:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply mor e reliable software (Wed Jul 11 2001 - 07:29:18 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barriers (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 18:06:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: More ordering constraints does not imply more reliable software (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 16:15:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Sun Jul 08 2001 - 03:20:08 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 11:17:50 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Sat Dec 16 2000 - 10:23:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Immutable objects which aren't immutable (Tue Apr 25 2000 - 06:26:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 10:30:35 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Final and Volatile array classes (Thu Mar 23 2000 - 08:25:46 EST)
• Mr. Tomcat
  • JavaMemoryModel: Can final fields change? (Fri Oct 04 2002 - 21:30:38 EDT)
• Nikola Petrov
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 08:35:44 EDT)
• np087@mdx.ac.uk
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legality of native code changing final field s (Wed Jun 13 2001 - 13:32:14 EDT)
• Ole Agesen - SunLabs
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: your message to the mailing list bounced... (Thu Jul 22 1999 - 18:41:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 18:24:43 EDT)
• P.H.Welch
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Threading issues in my connection pool (Thu Sep 07 2000 - 13:36:25 EDT)
• P.H.Welch@ukc.ac.uk
  • JavaMemoryModel: Communicating Process Architectures ... (Fri Jul 20 2001 - 12:08:27 EDT)
• Patrick Doyle
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft of JavaOne talk (Fri May 26 2000 - 10:47:59 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM on clusters (Fri May 26 2000 - 00:12:21 EDT)
• Paul Haahr
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Sun Jul 21 2002 - 17:28:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Double-Checked Locking is Broken (Sun Feb 10 2002 - 19:00:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OT: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 20:28:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: volatile arrays (Thu Dec 02 1999 - 18:48:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Major yuck! GET/PUTSTATIC prohibitsreordering (Mon Nov 15 1999 - 11:05:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: acquire & releases on volatile variables (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 17:58:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 22:04:59 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Code that sleeps and expects to see changes (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 14:41:00 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:42:05 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Thu Oct 21 1999 - 17:15:01 EDT)
  • re: JavaMemoryModel: final, pseudo-final and write protected fields (Wed Oct 20 1999 - 19:37:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reply to field cleared (Mon Jul 26 1999 - 15:37:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: final isn't used much in the JDK, even when it could (Wed Jul 21 1999 - 12:11:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Worries about JIT compilation and class loading on multiprocessors (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 16:44:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 18:15:35 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: class initialization (was: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads) (Mon Jul 05 1999 - 14:30:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 15:17:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 15:53:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 15:46:01 EDT)
• Paul Jakubik
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another Java threading issue (finalization) (Tue Apr 01 2003 - 18:18:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing formalization of "causal loop" safety (Mon Jul 15 2002 - 14:08:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: StringBuffer intensive codes/applications/benchmarks (Thu Apr 25 2002 - 14:50:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Tue Apr 23 2002 - 20:16:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Holub's Rules to Live By (Thu Jun 29 2000 - 10:54:32 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 19:26:34 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 17:58:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Tue Jun 13 2000 - 16:55:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Mon Jun 12 2000 - 12:03:38 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 18:40:22 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 12:11:52 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Wed May 24 2000 - 19:14:15 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Wed May 24 2000 - 11:48:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Tue May 23 2000 - 12:14:32 EDT)
• Paul Loewenstein
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proof to show that M/P obeys SC- (Mon Jan 26 2004 - 17:24:43 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:30:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 12:34:35 EDT)
• Raymie Stata
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Mon Nov 08 1999 - 10:22:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new memory model for Java (Sun Oct 24 1999 - 09:20:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 09:52:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Fri Jul 02 1999 - 09:51:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 11:12:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 01:22:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Java and architectures w/ aggressive reordering (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 01:17:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 23:35:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 12:04:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 17:44:23 EDT)
• Richard Jones
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu Apr 10 2003 - 05:59:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Sat Sep 15 2001 - 14:00:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: OOPSLA Workshop? (Thu Mar 30 2000 - 04:24:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A memory model for the masses (Wed Nov 10 1999 - 10:45:07 EST)
• Rob Strom
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel volatile ordering and the optimistic readers trans (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 16:26:20 EDT)
• Rob Strom/Watson/IBM
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 16:46:09 EST)
• Robert Munyer
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 23:18:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 20:22:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Mon Dec 18 2000 - 14:53:02 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 20:05:31 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 14:30:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Unsynchronized read as an optimization (Fri Dec 15 2000 - 13:50:52 EST)
• robstrom@us.ibm.com
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 14:12:26 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Optimistic Read Idiom and the new Java Memory Model (Mon Oct 30 2000 - 10:36:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Tue Oct 26 1999 - 23:51:22 EDT)
• Roly Perera
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: OT: Semantics for yield and sleep (Wed Jan 09 2002 - 04:44:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 14:04:50 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Guaranteed semantics for Thread.yield() (Mon Dec 31 2001 - 11:23:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics musings (Wed Sep 26 2001 - 07:01:39 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: What's "control dependence" mean? (Tue Sep 25 2001 - 07:36:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:41:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Java Memory Model and exceptions ? (Wed Aug 22 2001 - 13:23:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legal implementations (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 11:57:08 EDT)
• sanjay@pa.dec.com
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing atomic object creation on Alphas may be cheap (Wed Oct 13 1999 - 14:29:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: cost of initialization-safety on an Alpha SMP (Mon Aug 30 1999 - 11:07:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: cost of initialization-safety on an Alpha SMP (Thu Aug 26 1999 - 14:38:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: cost of initialization-safety on an Alpha SMP (Wed Aug 18 1999 - 18:11:16 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Worries about JIT compilation and class loading on multiprocessors (Wed Jul 14 1999 - 19:57:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another software-only solution (Thu Jul 01 1999 - 11:16:31 EDT)
• Sarita Adve
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Thu Aug 18 2005 - 00:09:49 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reference on "Correctly synchronized programs are sequentially consistent" (Fri Aug 27 2004 - 17:43:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:09:14 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Do any JVM's move memory accesses across native calls? (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 23:44:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Non SC behaviour using volatiles. (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 23:24:16 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Non SC behaviour using volatiles. (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 17:37:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 11:38:28 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 17:59:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 13:19:13 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 08:09:56 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 20:30:53 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 23:43:59 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 10:34:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 10:26:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 03:14:43 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Sat Apr 03 2004 - 03:11:31 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Correspondence with Sandhya on Treadmarks (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 12:31:23 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: My final summary of strong vs. weak volatile semantics (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 11:33:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 11:23:56 EST)
  • RE: [Fwd: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile] (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 10:25:41 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 01:06:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 00:40:39 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Sun Feb 29 2004 - 23:34:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Small typo in my previous message (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 11:08:45 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sun Feb 08 2004 - 00:23:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Stronger version of SC- that forbids tests 5 and 10 (Sat Feb 07 2004 - 23:24:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Wed Jan 21 2004 - 17:49:35 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Any more objective technical concerns for SC-? (Wed Jan 21 2004 - 17:12:18 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proof to show that M/P obeys SC- (Wed Jan 21 2004 - 16:57:11 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 02:42:46 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 02:31:24 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 15:53:07 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Mon Jan 12 2004 - 10:32:08 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Sat Jan 10 2004 - 08:25:56 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 21:46:17 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Implications of SC-: we need your feedback (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 21:46:01 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC- update (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 05:08:27 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Implications of SC-: we need your feedback (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 05:10:16 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Thu Dec 11 2003 - 16:28:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: RE: feedback: SC- Memory Model for Java (Wed Nov 19 2003 - 11:09:45 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The SC- memory model (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 13:34:59 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 17:07:21 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 14:45:34 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: That gap again (Fri Aug 08 2003 - 02:22:56 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Community Review Draft updated (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 17:55:52 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Hoist by my own petard; the real difference between 5 & 6 (Mon Aug 04 2003 - 01:21:58 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: test case 11; allowed by Manson/Pugh but not by SC-1 (Mon Aug 04 2003 - 00:54:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 18:29:08 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Results of discussions with Sarita (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 18:09:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A major problem with CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 18:58:46 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 11:40:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: I take this back - Causality vs. CnC causality (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 02:39:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Causality vs. CnC causality (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 02:16:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: General rules (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:28:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:04:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 00:43:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: CnC in SC- framework (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 21:26:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 18:18:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles in Sarita's model (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 17:01:21 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 14:42:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:57:36 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 07:09:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 06:45:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: What should the SC- discontinuities be? This list should decide. (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 21:16:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 20:29:07 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:59:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC- with better line breaks :-) (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:18:36 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:04:07 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Stripped down intuitive description of my model (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:44:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 14:24:40 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:08:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New document (Sun Jul 27 2003 - 21:00:20 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Sat Jul 26 2003 - 10:31:56 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 11:07:25 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Should we prohibit all causal loops? (Thu Jul 03 2003 - 13:42:51 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Should we prohibit all causal loops? (Fri Jun 27 2003 - 12:30:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question: Why is it that Memory Models are Intuitively Hard? (Wed Feb 19 2003 - 16:05:04 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A simplified version of my model (Thu Aug 22 2002 - 08:21:08 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Our latest trial balloon (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:42:40 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A simplified version of my model (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:37:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Comments on Sarita's example for our model, and on Sarita's model (Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:34:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Comments on Sarita's example for our model, and on Sarita's model (Fri Aug 16 2002 - 13:46:20 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:26:04 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 17:39:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: SC for DRF programs with Bill/Jeremy's new approach? (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 12:21:17 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: My approach (Thu Aug 08 2002 - 00:33:22 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: SC for DRF programs with Bill/Jeremy's new approach? (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 23:57:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: RE: Total ordering of volatile memory operations (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 23:07:26 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC for DRF programs with Bill/Jeremy's new approach? (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 12:20:03 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Aug 06 2002 - 20:21:19 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Another approach (Tue Jul 30 2002 - 20:36:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Another approach (Tue Jul 30 2002 - 20:04:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Tue Jul 30 2002 - 13:41:27 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: JSR 133 Status report (Tue Jul 02 2002 - 15:19:55 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: High-level necessary and sufficient requirements for a Java memory model (Mon Apr 29 2002 - 18:33:12 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: RE: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 15:14:02 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 15:09:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 12:53:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:09:17 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Thu Jul 19 2001 - 10:10:36 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Write atomicity for volatiles (Wed Jul 18 2001 - 14:42:34 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Write - Read reordering for non-normals (Wed Jul 18 2001 - 11:53:19 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Fri Jul 13 2001 - 14:44:00 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barriers (Fri Jul 13 2001 - 12:49:47 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:31:45 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles are neither 1 way nor 2 way barriers (Tue Jul 10 2001 - 16:11:39 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Mon Jul 09 2001 - 17:17:42 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Specification (Mon Jul 09 2001 - 16:06:10 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Roach motel ordering: Do we have consensus? (Mon Jul 09 2001 - 14:55:44 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: RE: Loops, programming languages, and weak fairness (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 18:08:24 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legal implementations (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 16:22:45 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 15:51:12 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of locks and volatiles (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 15:36:35 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 18:38:29 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 18:31:33 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of locks and volatiles (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 17:53:32 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 17:42:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Ordering of volatile and monitor actions (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 17:07:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 23:41:37 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Goals for the memory model and alternatives (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 18:05:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 15:23:42 EDT)
• Sean McDirmid
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 01:29:58 EDT)
• Sean McDirmid
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More synchronization statistics (Thu Nov 11 1999 - 00:07:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 14:54:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem with Thread.sleep (Mon Oct 25 1999 - 13:40:06 EDT)
• Sergey
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM: Fig. 24 (Wed Sep 03 2003 - 05:58:22 EDT)
• Sergey Polyakov
  • JavaMemoryModel: Causality Test 16 (Thu Dec 18 2003 - 04:05:29 EST)
• Shpeisman, Tatiana
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Store/load barrier (Tue Oct 21 2003 - 14:31:06 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Store/load barrier (Mon Oct 20 2003 - 17:16:58 EDT)
• smidkiff@us.ibm.com
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Removal of Synchronization on Weakly Ordered Machines (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 13:38:07 EDT)
• Srinivas_Kunani@toyota.com
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Wed Sep 17 2003 - 17:12:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Will this solution work? (Tue Sep 16 2003 - 23:48:46 EDT)
• Steve Kautz
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 15:34:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: fusing synch blocks (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 12:46:38 EST)
• Sylvia Else
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Fri May 06 2005 - 21:54:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Sun May 01 2005 - 01:51:28 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Synchronization order and finalization (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 21:52:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Tue Jan 04 2005 - 03:53:41 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Happy birthday JMM mailing list (Sat Jun 26 2004 - 19:29:51 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: transient final fields and deserialization (Thu Jun 10 2004 - 19:00:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of (Sun May 30 2004 - 22:34:52 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of (Sun May 30 2004 - 20:43:20 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Performing speculative writes ahead of loops that may not terminate (Sun May 30 2004 - 18:46:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Thu May 27 2004 - 20:52:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Thu May 27 2004 - 00:24:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final? (Wed May 26 2004 - 01:48:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are this$x fields final? (Mon May 24 2004 - 19:43:19 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are this$x fields final? (Mon May 24 2004 - 19:25:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM Final draft Freeze Complete today! (Mon May 24 2004 - 17:07:45 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: References (Thu May 20 2004 - 21:34:14 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: References (Wed May 19 2004 - 19:13:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification (Tue May 18 2004 - 19:23:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 22:57:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 21:01:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 20:50:54 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: More Specification (Fri Apr 30 2004 - 02:44:11 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Mon Apr 26 2004 - 18:23:44 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 22:16:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive (Sat Apr 24 2004 - 02:19:57 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another attempt at formalizing finalization; need particular attention from parallel GC people (Fri Apr 23 2004 - 20:39:35 EDT)
  • Re: Fw: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Thu Apr 22 2004 - 06:36:24 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Qualified this is final? (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:30:10 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposal on finalizers (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:28:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Wed Apr 21 2004 - 04:10:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:44:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another important finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 19:20:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalizer question (Mon Apr 19 2004 - 18:36:23 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Qualified this is final? (Sat Apr 17 2004 - 04:05:06 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Do any JVM's move memory accesses across native calls? (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:30:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 20:40:05 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Non SC behaviour using volatiles. (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 18:51:47 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Non SC behaviour using volatiles. (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 14:59:40 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 13:54:20 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: New Unified JMM Description (Thu Apr 15 2004 - 03:07:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Moving memory operations across external actions (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 19:04:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Intentional data race in String.hashCode() (Wed Apr 14 2004 - 02:48:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Weak fairness in the Java memory model (Tue Apr 13 2004 - 23:21:35 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 23:22:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 01:18:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Sat Apr 10 2004 - 02:05:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 20:22:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Wed Apr 07 2004 - 20:09:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile interpretation (Mon Mar 29 2004 - 22:24:08 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Sticking with happens-before (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 17:00:02 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: missing ingredient of volatile semantic (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 19:21:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are correctly synchronized code fragment executions SC? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 16:50:18 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 22:55:47 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Are correctly synchronized code fragment executions SC? (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 17:59:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: IMPORTANT: New Unified JMM formalism, $100 reward for any flaws (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 21:22:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 18:37:42 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 05:07:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Deserializing transient final fields (was: Will String be secure?) (Thu Mar 04 2004 - 23:43:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Will String be secure? (Wed Mar 03 2004 - 21:32:24 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Programmer Oriented FAQ (Thu Feb 12 2004 - 01:25:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Programmer Oriented FAQ (Wed Feb 11 2004 - 19:16:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Fri Feb 06 2004 - 08:29:14 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Isolation properties in the JMM (Sun Feb 01 2004 - 17:23:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft version of JSR-133 public review document (Thu Jan 29 2004 - 21:34:01 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 20:28:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Wait/notify semantics (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 16:02:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 15:55:02 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Mon Jan 19 2004 - 01:33:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 20:03:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 18:21:38 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A different slant with reference leakage (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 05:14:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I want to prohibit test cases 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 18 2004 - 01:37:34 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Wed Jan 14 2004 - 18:45:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 23:10:47 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Implications of SC-: we need your feedback (Fri Jan 09 2004 - 22:08:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implications of SC-: we need your feedback (Wed Jan 07 2004 - 18:00:23 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Mon Jan 05 2004 - 15:26:28 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Unexpected weakness/divergence in old JVM spec of final fields (Sun Dec 28 2003 - 18:06:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Causality Test 16 (Sat Dec 20 2003 - 16:51:41 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing SC to avoid global total orders. (Wed Dec 17 2003 - 18:18:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Fri Dec 12 2003 - 17:44:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Thu Dec 11 2003 - 00:15:48 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Wed Dec 10 2003 - 18:11:40 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Total orders (Mon Dec 08 2003 - 17:17:01 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Tue Dec 02 2003 - 04:12:19 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Sun Nov 30 2003 - 22:18:40 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 18:32:21 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Thu Nov 27 2003 - 14:49:31 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 22:14:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering prioritized InterruptedExceptions (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 17:57:51 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reconsidering spurious wakeups (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 17:45:03 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: wait/notify/interrupt - a visible state model - FWIW (Wed Nov 26 2003 - 04:01:25 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: wait/notify/interrupt - a visible state model - FWIW (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 23:34:02 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 22:19:33 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: wait/notify/interrupt - a visible state model - FWIW (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 18:00:47 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Tue Nov 25 2003 - 06:03:03 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Sat Nov 22 2003 - 23:02:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Sat Nov 22 2003 - 18:04:23 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 21:58:06 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JSR133 para 12.2 wording. (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 18:25:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 18:02:38 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Fri Nov 21 2003 - 17:49:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: finalization review (Thu Nov 20 2003 - 22:00:11 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Prioritizing IE without notifyAll(). (Thu Nov 20 2003 - 01:18:55 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Wed Nov 19 2003 - 15:53:28 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 20:43:49 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Tue Nov 18 2003 - 17:18:44 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 21:05:15 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 19:02:33 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 16:56:20 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Mon Nov 17 2003 - 14:40:36 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Sat Nov 15 2003 - 00:01:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread model algorithm. (Fri Nov 14 2003 - 23:16:32 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 22:56:36 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Thu Nov 13 2003 - 20:37:06 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 03:27:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about implementation of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap (Mon Nov 10 2003 - 23:36:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Thu Nov 06 2003 - 16:15:01 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: october JMM spec seems to break java's threading model (Wed Nov 05 2003 - 15:25:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 20:22:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Wed Oct 29 2003 - 21:40:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Mon Oct 27 2003 - 14:58:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Sun Oct 26 2003 - 17:16:49 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: JMM and caches. (Sun Oct 26 2003 - 04:41:15 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why not delegate System.in/out/err, instead of see it as special case? (Sat Oct 04 2003 - 18:15:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Sat Aug 09 2003 - 20:39:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed wording on lost interrupts (Thu Aug 07 2003 - 01:21:47 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: No decision on lost notifications (Wed Aug 06 2003 - 02:47:30 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 21:08:06 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Fri Jun 06 2003 - 07:19:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Thu Jun 05 2003 - 08:04:41 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Wed May 28 2003 - 00:13:42 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 17:08:56 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 08:15:09 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 07:56:01 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 03:16:55 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Tue May 27 2003 - 03:13:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Proposals on wait and interrupts (Mon May 26 2003 - 23:07:31 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 03:06:11 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 21:02:37 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Sat May 24 2003 - 03:56:42 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Fri May 23 2003 - 23:59:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Fri May 23 2003 - 21:03:20 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft of Complete Memory Model now available! (Wed May 21 2003 - 22:05:54 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: A problematical case for finalizers (Thu May 15 2003 - 01:52:06 EDT)
• TEREKHOV@de.ibm.com
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Wed Mar 28 2001 - 01:53:30 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 14:45:00 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: "Double-Checked Locking is Broken" (Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:41:40 EST)
• Thomas Hawtin
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finalization idioms (Mon May 02 2005 - 17:33:23 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Thu May 20 2004 - 21:50:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: When can a classloader be unloaded (Wed May 19 2004 - 22:42:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: String literals and String.intern() (Fri Apr 16 2004 - 23:30:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Bugs in Tiger beta 1 (Thu Mar 11 2004 - 16:36:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Bugs in Tiger beta 1 (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 20:22:23 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 17:21:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class Loaders and Garbage Collection (Sat Jun 07 2003 - 20:11:14 EDT)
• Thomas Maslen
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Mon May 26 2003 - 03:28:16 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Waits, Interrupts and Notify-s (Fri May 23 2003 - 21:46:34 EDT)
• Thomas Wang
  • JavaMemoryModel: missing ingredient of volatile semantic (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 18:13:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: "synchronizes with" (Thu Mar 25 2004 - 12:47:59 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about volatiles (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 14:38:41 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Another litmus test for strong vs. weak volatiles (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 20:38:03 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 14:12:13 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: another question on volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 19:39:21 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 17 2004 - 18:01:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutually exclusive goals for Java memory model (Thu Apr 18 2002 - 20:22:24 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: re: Threading issues in my connection pool (Fri Sep 01 2000 - 13:05:35 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: correct string issue summary? (Wed Jul 19 2000 - 18:26:35 EDT)
• Tim Harris
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Indirect loads and processor consistency (Tue Dec 03 2002 - 18:38:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about _current_ semantics of start (Mon Jun 19 2000 - 10:17:01 EDT)
• Tom Cargill
  • JavaMemoryModel: Holub's Rules to Live By (Thu Jun 29 2000 - 08:29:31 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Finializers again (this is important) (Mon Jan 17 2000 - 10:16:26 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: finalize semantics (Mon Dec 13 1999 - 20:04:16 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Serialization and final fields (Wed Aug 25 1999 - 07:23:38 EDT)
• Tom May
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Race-proof mutable objects and synchronized constructors (Fri Dec 01 2000 - 22:15:13 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Problem on single processor (Thu May 25 2000 - 14:49:36 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics of volatile (Wed Mar 22 2000 - 14:16:42 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sun Jul 04 1999 - 18:12:46 EDT)
• Tom Schrijvers
  • JavaMemoryModel: [ANN]: JmmSolve 0.1.2: generative implementation of CCMs (Fri Mar 19 2004 - 03:10:04 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: [ANN]: JmmSolve 0.1: generative implementation of CCMs (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 10:35:30 EST)
• Tony Hosking
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Fri Feb 20 2004 - 21:38:23 EST)
• V.C. Sreedhar
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Java's insecure parallelism (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 11:28:39 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Java's insecure parallelism (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 06:58:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Removal of Synchronization on Weakly Ordered Machines (Tue Jun 29 1999 - 13:40:27 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: To race or not to race (Mon Jun 28 1999 - 14:30:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 09:18:56 EDT)
• Victor Luchangco
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Tue May 18 2004 - 17:39:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Tue May 18 2004 - 14:49:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: more suggestions (Tue May 18 2004 - 14:32:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 14:56:48 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 12:03:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 11:30:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 11:04:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Mon May 17 2004 - 10:33:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Use-case for strong volatile (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 09:47:07 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: CSJP deadine extended (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 12:11:32 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: How about "Synchronizes to" and "Synchronizes from" (Fri Mar 26 2004 - 11:17:25 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Call for Papers: Concurrency and Synchronization in Java Programs Workshop (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 16:52:33 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: My final summary of strong vs. weak volatile semantics (Wed Mar 24 2004 - 16:45:17 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Call for Papers: Java Concurrency Workshop (Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:27:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 25 2004 - 09:27:52 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Way forward on JSR-133 (Thu Jan 15 2004 - 18:44:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Examples similar to tests 5 and 10 (Sun Jan 11 2004 - 06:52:50 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Updated JMM schedule and status report (Fri Jul 25 2003 - 12:15:59 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why I am resisting putting data/control dependences into the semantics (Fri Aug 10 2001 - 11:03:02 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 14:30:32 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Thread Synchronization at Creation and Termination (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 10:05:31 EST)
• Victor Toni
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Thu Feb 24 2005 - 05:20:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 18:03:43 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Access to final members by super through overloaded methods (Tue Feb 22 2005 - 15:37:24 EST)
• Victor.Luchangco@sun.com
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Thu Aug 18 2005 - 07:09:33 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: JLS3 contains glitch concerning volatiles? (Wed Aug 17 2005 - 23:13:08 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Let them write race-free code (was: The property of "race-free implies SC") (Tue Nov 11 2003 - 16:02:12 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 18:19:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 17:29:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Newbie Question (Tue Oct 28 2003 - 12:11:05 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Update to memory model (Mon Sep 08 2003 - 09:35:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Results of discussions with Sarita (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 22:56:00 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: How bad are incorrectly synchronized programs? (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 04:30:56 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: "Causality" (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 04:18:05 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Procedural questions (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 01:50:21 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: General rules (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:05:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: specific Causality test cases (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:01:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 18:10:25 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles in Sarita's model (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 17:16:22 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:34:30 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Why CnC (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 10:55:27 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 09:39:26 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The Intuition Is the Model - the full model is in this email! (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 01:12:12 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 00:26:55 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Agreement to disagree: where things stand (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 15:37:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executions I find profoundly troubling (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 13:05:49 EDT)
• Vijay Saraswat
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: PC language alert: catatonia action (Sun May 16 2004 - 08:06:38 EDT)
  • [Fwd: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions] (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 18:59:48 EDT)
  • [Fwd: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop()] (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 18:59:04 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 08:54:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 08:41:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Sun Apr 11 2004 - 07:37:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 14:16:53 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Fri Apr 09 2004 - 08:11:46 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exc eptions, Tread.stop() (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 17:36:49 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Interaction between the memory model and exceptions (Thu Apr 08 2004 - 09:43:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Definition of volatile revisited (Mon Mar 22 2004 - 08:59:51 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Test Case 18 variations (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 11:50:02 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 11:21:16 EST)
  • [Fwd: Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile] (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 09:09:46 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: allowed semantics question (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 06:10:18 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Minor issue on hb edges and interrupts (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:53:09 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: another question on volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:43:27 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Question about the semantics of volatile (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:14:30 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Are correctly synchronized code fragment executions SC? (Thu Mar 18 2004 - 05:00:36 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Important typo fix in unified model description: U6 is not allowed (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 23:03:25 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Important typo fix in unified model description: U6 is not allowed (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 20:04:00 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The Ucases (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 18:23:04 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: IMPORTANT: New Unified JMM formalism, $100 reward for any flaws (Tue Mar 16 2004 - 18:12:53 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Wed Mar 10 2004 - 11:01:39 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: [ANN] Paper on Java Memory Models (Tue Mar 09 2004 - 16:08:35 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 20:29:29 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 18:06:29 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: New test case? (Mon Mar 08 2004 - 18:01:00 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JMM Synopsis (Mon Mar 01 2004 - 10:00:10 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Test Case 18b (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 15:24:37 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: (Proposal) Semantics must satisfy Linking Monotonicity. (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 14:40:11 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Thu Feb 26 2004 - 12:00:34 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Typo in Case 9 and Case 9a? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 18:30:45 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 16:32:37 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 15:50:39 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Reopen Case 18? (Wed Feb 25 2004 - 12:21:55 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Test case 15 (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 05:20:09 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Comments on JSR-133 document (Feb 2, 2004) (Wed Feb 04 2004 - 20:29:58 EST)
• vsarkar@us.ibm.com
  • JavaMemoryModel: Is "memory coherence" necessary in the new JMM? (Fri Jul 23 1999 - 15:26:36 EDT)
• William Pugh
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New Causality Test (Sun Feb 15 2004 - 10:53:57 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Legal implementations (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 13:30:33 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Loops, programming languages, and weak fairness (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 11:22:06 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Legal implementations (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 11:02:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Properties vs. definitions vs. implementations (Fri Jul 06 2001 - 10:52:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Good news on IA-64 (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 09:12:37 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Schedule for changing the Java Memory Model (Wed Jan 19 2000 - 09:02:16 EST)
  • Finializers again (this is important) (Sat Jan 15 2000 - 22:51:26 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Class initialization safety is hard (Fri Jul 09 1999 - 19:36:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: RE: Question on memory models (Wed Jun 30 1999 - 23:19:18 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Idiom for safe, unsynchronized reads (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 21:56:58 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Re: Getting the ball rolling... (Sat Jun 26 1999 - 20:03:22 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Introductions... (Fri Jun 25 1999 - 20:01:00 EDT)
• Y. S. Ramakrishna
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: FWD: Question regarding nested synchronized blocks (Mon Apr 22 2002 - 20:40:36 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Semantics for yield and sleep (Tue Jan 08 2002 - 16:53:22 EST)
• Yang, Yue
  • JavaMemoryModel: Final Semantics? (Sun Mar 31 2002 - 21:26:58 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Mon Mar 25 2002 - 13:00:48 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 15:57:22 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: SC or Coherence for Volatiles? (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 11:50:25 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Non-Atomic Volatiles (Thu Mar 21 2002 - 11:07:24 EST)
• Yue Yang
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Draft JSR-133 Cookbook for compiler writers (Fri Dec 06 2002 - 12:02:19 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 13:09:41 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The range of memory models now in play (Fri Aug 09 2002 - 00:16:03 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 19:45:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Wed Aug 07 2002 - 18:07:58 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Relaxing formalization of "causal loop" safety (Thu Aug 01 2002 - 17:47:00 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Wed Jul 31 2002 - 12:51:08 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Update on our alternative JMM specification (Mon Jul 29 2002 - 19:50:43 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: New approach to defining the Java Memory Model (Thu Jul 25 2002 - 16:57:29 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Tue Jul 09 2002 - 19:40:37 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:17:10 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: prescient write question (Tue Jul 02 2002 - 11:56:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A new JMM specification framework (Wed Apr 24 2002 - 13:53:24 EDT)
• Yue Yang
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: correct synchronization (Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:28:05 EST)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A constraint-based approach for memory model specification and analysis (Wed Jan 28 2004 - 12:29:10 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Sat Nov 01 2003 - 00:10:25 EST)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 31 2003 - 16:37:40 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Thu Oct 30 2003 - 16:53:38 EST)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Fri Oct 24 2003 - 12:36:48 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: The property of "race-free implies SC" (Thu Oct 23 2003 - 18:48:59 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 23:40:49 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: The choice we need to make on test cases 5 and 10 (Fri Aug 01 2003 - 17:37:13 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A major problem with CnC (Thu Jul 31 2003 - 00:25:01 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A major problem with CnC (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 23:49:38 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: A two-phase approach to resolve causal loops (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 16:04:41 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: A two-phase approach to resolve causal loops (Wed Jul 30 2003 - 12:59:19 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Volatiles in Sarita's model (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 16:32:50 EDT)
  • RE: JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:40:15 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Mutual exclusion effect of locks (Mon Jul 28 2003 - 22:58:28 EDT)
  • Re: JavaMemoryModel: Executable specifications (Wed May 14 2003 - 22:15:21 EDT)
  • JavaMemoryModel: Model Checking the CRF JMM (Mon Jul 02 2001 - 13:07:21 EDT)