RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?

From: David Holmes (dholmes@dltech.com.au)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 18:46:47 EDT

Next message: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "Re: A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification"
In reply to: Sylvia Else: "JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Next in thread: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Reply: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rather then dictate implementation can we not simply state that for the
purposes of the JMM, references to the enclosing instance of an inner
instance behave as-if they were accessed through a final field of the inner
instance?

David Holmes

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

Next message: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Previous message: Bill Pugh: "Re: A few typos -> RE: JavaMemoryModel: Proposed Final Specification"
In reply to: Sylvia Else: "JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Next in thread: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Reply: Jerry Schwarz: "RE: JavaMemoryModel: Re: Are this$x fields final?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:01:08 EDT