Doug Lea wrote:
> People on this list might be interested in seeing
> the new draft of the real-time java spec...
>
I second this suggestion.
Public review of rev. 0.90 began 12/15/99 and continues until 2/14/00.
Some of the things to check out:
NoHeapRealtimeThread
ImmortalMemory
ImmortalPhysicalMemory
ScopedMemory
ScopedPhysicalMemory
RawMemoryAccess
By the way, I'm a paid reviewer.
-- Joe Bowbeer----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Lea" <dl@altair.cs.oswego.edu> To: <javaMemoryModel@cs.umd.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 3:08 PM Subject: JavaMemoryModel: real-time java spec
> > People on this list might be interested in seeing the new draft > real-time java spec at: > http://www.rtj.org/ > > It doesn't explicitly mention the Java memory model but arguably > should. Considering that it is geared primarily towards small > embedded uniprocessors, maybe it need not. But it does not seem to > rule out implementation on multiprocessors. On a casual read-through, > I saw many potential interactions with memory model issues that would > arise. >
------------------------------- JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:24 EDT