JavaMemoryModel: Confirmation that we are using strong volatile semantics

From: Bill Pugh (pugh@cs.umd.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 24 2004 - 11:03:08 EDT

Next message: Doron Rajwan: "JavaMemoryModel: Deliberate undersynchronization"
Previous message: Sylvia Else: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Since there was discussion about the topic, I just wanted to let
everyone know that the expert group spent some time discussing it,
and agreed without dissent to adopt the strong semantics for volatiles.

Bill

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

Next message: Doron Rajwan: "JavaMemoryModel: Deliberate undersynchronization"
Previous message: Sylvia Else: "Re: JavaMemoryModel: Implementing KeepAlive"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:01:06 EDT