Next: 14 Some Gender Pitfalls
Up: gradstudy
Previous: 12 Careers in Government
Contents
Subsections
13 Professional Ethics
In this section we consider some of the ``rules of the game."
Some of these are obvious to most of us, but some might
be surprising due to cultural differences or lack of consideration.
Further resources can be found in Section 15.12.
The purpose of ethical standards is to provide an implicit
foundation upon which human interactions can proceed smoothly.
They answer questions such as
- ``How much credit do I need to give previous authors
whose words or ideas I have used?"
- ``How much help can I get on
a homework assignment without cheating?"
- ``Can I use the computers at school or work
to earn extra money?"
- ``Should I ask my student for a date?"
- ``Should I warn a hospital that my company has delivered
a shoddy piece of software to them?"
The next five subsections address each of these questions,
and related issues, in turn.
In some cultures it has been acceptable to take another person's
work and present it as your own. For instance, many Baroque
music masterpieces are built upon musical themes ``borrowed"
without explicitly giving credit.
In current Western culture, this is unacceptable, whether it
involves music, ideas, or words, and we define the taking of
someone's words or ideas as plagiarism.
(It was particularly disheartening to discover that
someone had plagiarized this discussion of ethics!)
Since ideas
and words represent creative effort and have intellectual value,
there is a well-defined system of property rights. Stealing
words or ideas is theft, just as surely as stealing automobiles,
and sanctions can be quite serious.
- Thus, if you take a paragraph from someone else's written work
and include it in your own work, you must enclose it in quotation
marks and give a citation. Even if you change some of the words
but leave the writing essentially unchanged, you must
put the unchanged pieces in quotation marks and list your
source.
- If a substantial part of your paper (say, a page or more)
consists of a summary of someone else's work using a
condensation of their words, or following the same
outline as their work, then you must say so: ``This section
is taken directly from [...]," or
``This summary closely follows [...]," etc.
- You cannot publish a work that is substantially taken
from another; you must have ``added some value" by
new ideas or new derivations or new implementations
and you must clearly distinguish between your work and
that of others.
The consequences of plagiarism might include an F in a course,
expulsion from a graduate program, or banning from having
any of your works published in a journal.
Patent rights must also be respected. If a device or idea
is patented, it should not be used in your work unless
you obtain the necessary permission.
People with a reputation for not giving due credit to
other researchers generally find it hard to find collaborators
and people who will write letters of recommendation for them.
The university system of education is built upon a high
level of trust that students and faculty will be honest
in their dealings with each other. It breaks down quickly
if this honesty is lacking.
Here are some actions that violate the trust, along
with the definitions
given in the University of Maryland
Code of Academic Integrity. Some of the
examples are taken from an old University of Maryland
Student Guide to Academic Integrity.
- cheating: ``fraud, deceit, or dishonesty in any academic course or
exercise in an attempt to gain an unfair adgantage and/or
intentionally using or attempting to
use unauthorized materials, information, or study aids in
any academic exercise."
It is cheating
to use a solution set obtained
by breaking into a professor's computer files,
to use an unauthorized ``crib sheet" on an exam,
to have a friend do your homework,
to look at another student's paper during an exam, etc.
- fabrication: ``intentional and unauthorized
falsification or invention of any information or citation
in an academic exercise."
You fabricate if you
enter false data in a log book,
add unused references to a bibliography,
change your answers before submitting a paper for regrade, etc.
- plagiarism: ``intentionally or knowingly representing
the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic
exercise."
Examples of plagiarism include
copying homework from another studen andt
claiming another person's idea as your own in a thesis.
It is also a violation of integrity to help someone
else in such actions for example, by lending your homework
paper to someone else, letting someone copy your answers
in an exam, revealing exam questions to people preparing
for an exam, helping someone to break into a colleague's
computer files, etc.
Such violations of trust are taken quite seriously at
universities and the consequences can include an F in
a course or expulsion from the university.
You should make yourself familiar with the code of
academic integrity at your university.
Each university has had to think very carefully about
the ethics involved in the use of computer facilities,
and most now have a formal document defining acceptable
and unacceptable use. The issues to balance
include free speech, communication of research without
unnecessary obstacles, and responsible attention to
law.
Here are a few examples of activities that are universally
prohibited:
- trying to access private files or unauthorized
computers.
- trying to
alter computer hardware or software without
authorization.
- trying to disrupt other's use of the computer,
for example, by sending email in
another user's name, by locking other user
out of a machine, etc.
- violating copyright or software agreements on
software packages.
- running a money-making operation using university
computers without permission.
- spamming. This means sending large volumes of email, thereby
disrupting communications for an entire set of
users. The usual purpose is either harassment
of an individual or widespread dissemination of
a ``get rich quick" pyramid-scheme mailing.
- using computers for illegal activities, including
pyramid schemes, making threats, theft, child pornography, etc.
Again, these are serious matters and are usually dealt
with either by suspension of computer privileges, expulsion
from the university, or legal charges.
You should make yourself familiar with the code of
computer use at your university.
The United States is not alone in its history of discrimination
toward large groups of people based on race, religion, or other
factors, but the legacy of these actions continues to
be divisive. In an attempt to redress past wrongs and prevent
future ones, the United States has built perhaps
the most complicated system of laws and regulations in existence,
many of them contradictory to some extent.
Rather than try to understand every fine point (e.g., when
are distinctions based on mental ability discriminatory?), it
is perhaps easier to be guided by two basic principles that
motivated the laws:
- It is wrong to use authority to coerce favors.
You also cannot appear
to be using your authority this way.
- Thus you cannot
ask students or employees to do personal errands for you
as a part of their duties.
This includes babysitting, shopping, etc.
- What requests are permissible?
You can ask students to do work assigned to the
class. You can ask teaching assistants
to do those duties associated with their
assigned class: grading, office hours, recitation
sections, etc.
You can ask research assistants to do
those duties associated with the research project:
library work, programming, running experiments,
writing reports, minor clerical work, etc.
- Any requests outside of these boundaries must
have the offer of compensation. For example,
a babysitting request or a request to work
at a professor's party must be accompanied by
market-rate payment and must have the understanding
of no penalty for saying ``no."
If you are asked to work at a conference that a professor
is organizing, the compensation is usually a waiver
of registration fee and a chance to network with
experts in the field.
If you are asked to help a professor referee a
paper, then your help should be acknowledged
in the professor's letter to the editor.
- Supervisors cannot ask to be listed as an author of
a paper to which they made minimal contribution.
The American Mathematical Society statement on
authorship is typical of professional standards:
All the authors listed for a paper, however, must have made a significant contribution to its content, and all who have made such a contribution must be offered the opportunity to be listed as an author.
mklinkAMS Policy Statement on Ethical Guidelines
http://www.ams.org/about-us/governance/policy-statements/sec-ethics
See the section on ``The Life of a Graduate Student"
4
for some additional discussion.
- Inappropriate use of authority is particularly
difficult to sort through if the relationship
is defined on multiple levels.
If you want to have a dating
relationship with your student or employee, it
is dangerous to do it while you
still have authority over that person.
It poisons the atmosphere for the class or research
group by giving the impression of favoritism.
It opens you to charges of sexual harassment if
the relationship sours.
- You must treat colleagues, supervisors, and
students with respect.
Even if you find it difficult to deal with
their ethnic background, religion, etc.,
your actions or attitudes in response to
these issues must not interfere with their work.
You cannot use such personal issues as a basis
for grading or promotion.
You cannot harass anyone.
Again, these issues are tied up in a tangle of laws.
If you run into trouble, talk to a trusted colleague
and check the human relations policy at your university.
Professional integrity encompasses a wide variety
of responsibilities. Here are a few of them.
- We must be honest in our professional dealings,
giving due credit for other peoples' ideas
and not claiming credit for work that we have
not done.
- We must treat professional colleagues and
students with respect.
- An old labor rallying cry says,
``A full day's work for a full day's pay."
Every job has its pleasant and unpleasant aspects.
(For me, the worst part of professional life is
dealing with academic dishonesty.) But in accepting
a job, we agree to perform all of its duties, not
just the pleasant ones.
- We cannot use the institution's
resources (computers, copying machines, postage, etc.)
for nonbusiness purposes without permission.
- The confidentiality of knowledge obtained
through professional activities must be respected.
For instance, we must safeguard students' grades,
the contents of private databases and papers
we referee, and trade secrets.
- The physician's motto is, ``First, do no harm."
This means that we must assure that any product or
idea that we deliver is as correct as we can make
it and has no unannounced defects. Our mathematical
model may be used to determine load limits on a
building or safeguards on a nuclear stockpile.
Our computer program may be used as a module
in a drug delivery system in a hospital or in
a guidance system in a passenger aircraft. We
must be sure that if our work is used as we
say it can be, that it will perform as intended.
See Section 15.12
for pointers to the ACM Code of Ethics, the AMS Code of Ethics,
and others.
``Some people live to work; others work to live."
Whether your job is your greatest joy in life
or just a duty, it is worth reflecting
on whether what you do at work contributes to
making the world better.
Maybe your work won't win a Nobel Prize, a Turing Award, or
a Fields Medal,
but you can use some of your creative energy to see that
your efforts have some positive value.
When all is said and done, your non-scholarly
contributions might far outweigh your scholarly ones
if you encouraged an
at-risk student, wrote a clear textbook,
helped a more junior colleague,
organized a conference that catalyzed new research,
or made a staff member's life a little easier.
Whatever your values, bring them to work.
Next: 14 Some Gender Pitfalls
Up: gradstudy
Previous: 12 Careers in Government
Contents
Dianne O'Leary
2016-10-12