References for Section 7">What makes the environment chilly?
1. M. D. Burton, ``Gender Differences in Professional Socialization: A Study of Women and Men Becoming Computer Scientists," Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (1987) referenced in C. D. Martin, ``Report on the Workshop: In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education," in C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma, eds. In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Oregon, (1992) pp. 1-8.
2. H. Etzkowitz, C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi, ``Restructuring Departments for Equity," pp. 93-101 in C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma, eds. In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Oregon, (1992)
3. V. Clarke, ``Strategies for Involving Girls in Computer Science," in C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma, eds. In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Oregon, (1992) pp. 71-86.
4. B. R. Sandler, ``The Classroom Climate: Chilly for Women?'' in A. L. Deneef, C. D. Goodwin, and E. S. McCrate, editors, The Academic Handbook, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina (1988) pp. 146-152.
5. H. Etzkowitz, C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi, How Women React to and Cope with Chilly Environments: Barriers to Women in Academic Science and Engineering in W. Pearson Jr. and I. Fechter (eds.) Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994.
6. J. Gutbezahl, How Negative Expectancies and Attitudes Undermine Females' Math Confidence and Performance: A Review of the Literature ERIC/CSMEE data base (article ED 380 279).
7. R. Rosenthal and L. Jacobson, Pygmalion in the Classroom, Irvington Publishers, Inc., New York (1992).
8. L. S. Klein, ``Female Students' Underachievement in Computer Science and Mathematics: Reasons and Recommendations," pp. 47-56 in C. D. Martin and E. Murchie-Beyma, eds. In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education, International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, Oregon, (1992)
9. B. Studer, Frauen an den Universitaeten in der Schweiz, Arbeitspapiere, Dokumentationsstelle für Wissenschaftspolitik, Wildhainweg 9, PF/CP 2732, CH-3001 Bern (1998)
10. D. C. Fort, ``The Consensus," in A Hand Up: Women Mentoring Women in Science, Association for Women in Science, Washington, D.C. (1993) , p.142.
Resources:
11. InGEAR: Report on the Status of Women 1993-1998, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
12. See the interviews with 37 women in A Hand Up: Women Mentoring Women in Science, Association for Women in Science, Washington, D.C. (1993)
Quotation:
13. H. Etzkowitz, C. Kemelgor, M. Neuschatz, and B. Uzzi, How Women React to and Cope with Chilly Environments: Barriers to Women in Academic Science and Engineering in W. Pearson Jr. and I. Fechter (eds.) Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994.
14. Charles M. Vest, Introductory Comments Study of Women Faculty in Science at MIT (March 1999)