2. Different Types of Benchmarks
2.1 Levels and Types of Benchmarks
Based on the levels of performance they measure, benchmarks can be grouped
into two levels:
- Component-level Benchmarks
- System-level Benchmarks
Based on their compositions, benchmarks can be categorized into types:
- Synthetic Benchmarks
- Application Benchmarks
2.2 Component-Level Benchmarks
Component-Level benchmarks
test a specific component of a computer system, such as the video board, the audio card, or the microprocessor. They are useful for selecting a component of a
computer system, that corresponds to a particular function. Instead of testing
the performance of the system running real applications, component-level
benchmarks focus on the performance of subsystems within a system. These
subsystems may include operating system, arithmetic interger unit, arithmetic
floating-point unit, memory system, disk subsystem, etc.
Examples of component-level benchmarks include:
-
SPECweb96 - measures the web server performance
-
GPC - measures graphics performance for displaying 3-D images
2.3 System-Level Benchmarks
System-Level benchmarks evaluate the overall performance of a computer running
real programs or applications. These benchmarks are
useful when comparing systems of different architectures. They take each
subsystem into account, and indicate the effect of each subsystem on the overall
performance. Examples of system-level benchmarks include:
-
SYSmark/NT 4.0 - measures the performance of computers
running popular business applications under Windows NT 4.0
-
TPC-C - measures the performance of transaction processing
system like
2.4 Synthetic Benchmarks
Synthetic benchmarks are created by combining basic computer functions in
proportions that developers feel will yield an indicative measure of the
performance capabilities of the machine under test. These benchmarks try to
match the average frequency of operations and operands of a large set of
programs. Functions included in synthetic benchmarks are usually created
artificially to match an average execution profile and this impairs their
credibility.
Synthetic benchmarks are component-level benchmarks, and they evaluate a
particular capability of a subsystem. For example, a disk subsystem performance
benchmark may combine a series of basic seek, read, and write operations
involving varying numbers of disk blocks of varying sizes.
When evaluating the results from synthetic benchmarks, the following rules should
be followed:
- understand the composition of the benchmark,
- appreciate the factors contributing to the results,
- determine if the benchmark tests functions that are typical
of your workload and environment.
Examples of synthetic benchmarks include:
-
WinBench 97 - measures the performance of a PC's graphics, disk,
processor, video and CD-ROM subsystems in Windows environment
-
MacBench 97 - measures the processor, floating-point, graphics,
video, and CD-ROM performance of a MAC OS system
2.5 Application Benchmarks
Application benchmarks employ actual application programs. Developers of
these benchmarks include applications that they feel perform common functions
from within a particular industry segment or a class of products. These
application programs are run by a macro of program operations which attempts
to model the way users operate their system.
Most application benchmarks are system-level benchmarks, and they measure the overall
performance of a system. When an application benchmark is run, it tests the
contribution of each component of the system to the overall performance. These
benchmarks are usually larger and difficult to execute and are not useful for
measuring future needs.
The major drawback is that application benchmarks are subject to the benchmark
developer's interpretation of a "typical workload". Examples of application
benchmarks include:
-
Winstone 97 - tests a PC's overall performance when running
Windows-based 32-bit business applications
-
SYSmark/NT 4.0 - measures the performance of computers
running popular business applications under Windows NT 4.0
| Overview |
Introduction |
Engineering |
Reporting |
Revising |
|Questions |