Re: JavaMemoryModel: Wait/notify semantics

From: Sylvia Else (sylviae@optushome.com.au)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 16:02:51 EST


At 03:21 PM 19/01/2004 -0500, Bill Pugh wrote:

>Any objections?

A formal objection, only, I suppose.

I object to the spurious interrupts, on the grounds that they are not
necessary, represent a change to the originally published specification
(whatever the writers might have intended at the time), and set the bad
precedent of fixing broken VMs by changing the specification.

Sylvia.

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:56 EDT