RE: JavaMemoryModel: That gap again

From: Sarita Adve (sadve@cs.uiuc.edu)
Date: Fri Aug 08 2003 - 02:22:56 EDT


Note that this paper does not take compiler optimizations into account. From
the hardware side, it is unclear how IA-64 processors would perform with
sequential consistency (IA-64 has a relaxed model).

Sarita

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-javamemorymodel@cs.umd.edu
> [mailto:owner-javamemorymodel@cs.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Ben Wint
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:41 AM
> To: javamemorymodel@cs.umd.edu
> Subject: JavaMemoryModel: That gap again
>
>
> Presumably you'd like community review feedback sent to
> some community review forum rather than cluttering up this
> mailing list. Where is that?
>
> Hill, IEEE Computer'98 >> How will the performance gap
> [between seq consistency & other models] change over the
> next ten years? One argument is that it will grow, because
> the latency to memory ... is likely to grow. On the contrary,
> I see two reasons that make it likely to shrink. <<
>
> Five years on, which way is it going?
>
> Ben Wint
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> JavaMemoryModel mailing list -
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
>

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:50 EDT