1. This year's review form had four nonstandard fields intended to express the components of the merit judgment. Overall, how did the presence of these fields affect your reviewing experience? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 43 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
I found them very useful | 11.6% | 5 | |
I found them somewhat useful | 30.2% | 13 | |
DIdn't matter to me one way or another | 32.6% | 14 | |
I viewed them somewhat negatively | 20.9% | 9 | |
I viewed them very negatively | 4.7% | 2 | |
Further comment view | 14 |
2. If you had to design your own review form, which fields would you have? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 41 | ||
skipped question | 2 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Overall merit | 100.0% | 41 | |
Expertise | 73.2% | 30 | |
Confidence in merit score | 58.5% | 24 | |
Quirkiness | 4.9% | 2 | |
Clarity | 46.3% | 19 | |
Conviction (convincingness of evidence) | 41.5% | 17 | |
Novelty | 39.0% | 16 | |
Importance | 39.0% | 16 | |
Other (list below) | 4.9% | 2 | |
Other (please specify) view | 6 |