| 1. Indicate which approach you prefer to handling supplemental material, which is submitted along with the full paper: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 19 | ||
| skipped question | 0 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Supplemental material is NOT anonymized (available after first review) |  | 78.9% | 15 |
| Supplemental material IS anonymized (available prior to first review) | | 10.5% | 2 |
| Both anonymous and non-anonymous material may be submitted | | 10.5% | 2 |
| Optionally provide reasons or qualifications for your choiceview | 7 | ||
| 2. Please indicate your current opinion about which choice is best: single-blind reviewing as is typically employed by POPL, or double-blind reviewing as described here and employed by PLDI 2010. Your answer should reflect your perception of the best choice on balance, based on which process you think is overall the most fair, most accurate, most enjoyable, etc. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| answered question | 18 | ||
| skipped question | 1 | ||
| Response Percent | Response Count | ||
| Traditional single-blind reviewing | | 22.2% | 4 |
| Double-blind reviewing as per PLDI 10 and POPL this year | | 77.8% | 14 |
| Optionally provide reasons or qualifications for your choiceview | 10 | ||