Does it means that anything less than preemptive
multitasking won't do?
Is J2ME OK with this?
Doron.
--- Bill Pugh <pugh@cs.umd.edu> wrote:
> OK, we're going to have to adjust this.
>
> Jeremy, Sarita and I are working on something, give
> us another day
> or so to sanity check it.
>
> The intent is still the same:
> * Not require any thread scheduling fairness
> * Prevent transformations such as hoisting
> a volatile read out of a loop (in the general
> case).
>
> Bill
>
> -------------------------------
> JavaMemoryModel mailing list -
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
=====
Doron Rajwan, mailto:doron@rajwan.org
-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:01:04 EDT