Re: JavaMemoryModel: A new box for the Java Memory model

From: Joshua Bloch (jbloch@eng.sun.com)
Date: Tue Nov 09 1999 - 22:19:11 EST

>In any case extending the semantics to cover array elements would be for
>completeness only. The new semantics of volatile and final can be defined
>without any reference to arrays.

   I don't get it. Do we need it or don't we?

          Josh

-------------------------------
JavaMemoryModel mailing list - http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 13 2005 - 07:00:22 EDT